Grand-sweeping-generalization Placemarker.
(See my ***Tagline***)
Yes, your tagline proves my point.
Commenting on others like that is “Another-stain-on-Conservatism”.
> Creationists on the internet: The Ignorant, amplifying the Stupid.)
Your tagline lends support to my observation that evolutionists have little else to counter their opponents than ad hominem.
Explain to all of us ignorant amplifying the stupid how a dinosaur transitions to a bird, given the unsurvivability of any intermediate species, as well as the lack of any evidence thereof in the fossil record, except, of course, for the occasional hoax.
No evidence whatsoever can be found in the fossil record of transitions from cold-blooded to warm-blooded, from a three-chambered heart to a four-chambered heart, from solid bones to hollow bones, and myriad other differences between amphibians and birds.
In order to adapt to this, Evolutionism had to evolve into “Hopeful Monsters”. Problem is, the Hopeful Monster would have to find another Hopeful Monster of the opposite gender that mutated at the same generation in the same place. A statistical joy.
You are free to believe this nonsense, couch it in scientific terminology, promote it, hype it, revel in it, evangelize it. But you can do so without my money.
Evolutionism should be relegated to the discussion of comparative religions, or, at best, in a discussion of theories of origin outside of the science classroom.
Theories of origins are not scientific, because the processes cannot be observed, nor can they be reproduced. You cannot prove randomness by design, as one obviates the other.
“One has only to contemplate the magnitude of this task to concede that the spontaneous generation of a living organism is impossible. Yet here we are-as a result, I believe, of spontaneous generation.”
Dr. George Wald
Evolutionist
“(See my ***Tagline***) ” [excerpt]Uh, ok...
DoctorMichael (Creationists on the internet: The Ignorant, amplifying the Stupid.)What the ...!