No, it's your link that's Bullsh!t. English Common law and Supreme Court case law are very clear that a person born in the US to non-citizen parents is a natural born citizen so long as he is subject to US jurisdiction when he is born.
It's all laid out here:
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2008/12/natural-born-citizen/
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2008/12/natural-born-citizen/
This website doesn't even reference Perkins v. Elg, the key Supreme Court case in this matter. Therefore, your statement that it's ALL laid out is incorrect on its face.
It's really all laid out here:
http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaNaturalBorn.htm
Get used to it, Obama is an usurper, whether you like it or not, or whether you agree with it or not.
>>> a person born in the US to non-citizen parents is a natural born citizen so long as he is subject to US jurisdiction when he is born.
Oh really? Can you cite any SCOTUS cases on this?!
Granting citizenship to illegal alien babies, as of the last few presidents (including Bush — grrr), is an Executive branch amnesty — via the State Department mostly. Neither Congress nor the Supreme Court has ever decided one way or the other on that issue, so the Executive branch has made their own interpretation, and has decided to allow them citizenship (certainly NOT Natural Born Citizenship), which, IMO, it does not have the Constitutional right to do.
Furthermore, the 14th Amendment was added to grant citizenship to slaves that were freed by the 13th Amendment since they were born on U.S. soil. It most definitely was NOT intended or envisioned so that women could travel thousands of miles (as transportation back then was a VERY risky endeavor), enter our country without going through Customs or any other type of Passport or Visa process, just to “break their water” on our sovereign soil in order for their child to become a “Natural Born Citizen”.
Please put the bong pipe down and start making some intelligent statements for once ...