Posted on 02/20/2009 3:15:29 PM PST by SandRat
NAVAL SUBMARINE BASE KINGS BAY, Ga., Feb. 20, 2009 The U.S. Navy has started the process to find a 21st-century successor to the Trident strategic missile submarine, senior Defense Department officials said here yesterday.
Tridents are nuclear-powered, Ohio-class submarines. At 560 feet long and 42 feet wide, Tridents are the largest submarines in the U.S. Navys inventory. The first Trident ballistic-missile submarine, the USS Ohio, was commissioned in 1981. A wide variety of options are being considered for the Tridents replacement, Winter said. However, the Navy secretary expressed his belief that the Trident system would be replaced by another undersea-going platform. I do fully expect that it is going to be a submarine, Winter said of the Tridents successor. Prior to the news conference the Navys top leaders and the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff were among senior officials who attended a ceremony that paid tribute to the crew of the USS Wyoming Trident strategic missile submarine. The USS Wyoming finished its 38th patrol Feb. 11, marking the 1000th completed patrol of a Trident submarine since the Ohio embarked on its initial patrol in October 1982. The Wyoming was commissioned in July 1996 and began its first patrol in August 1997. Marine Corps Gen. James E. Cartwright, the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, echoed Winters belief that the Tridents replacement will be a submarine. Chief of Naval Operations Navy Adm. Gary Roughead told reporters of the resilience and independence exhibited by submariners families. I think the families of our submariners are really like submariners, a special breed, Roughead said. And, my hats off to them, and they have my utmost respect and support. The U.S. military is about to embark on its Quadrennial Defense Review and a Nuclear Posture Review, Cartwright said, to determine what types of defense capabilities will be required to maintain U.S. national security in the coming years. The QDR is performed every four years. The threats America faces during the 21st century are much more diverse and involve a much broader spectrum of conflict against a much broader number of enemies, to include those that are not nation-states, Cartwright told reporters. Gauging and evaluating future threats and determining what kinds of military capabilities and systems will be needed to deter them will be debated during the QDR and the nuclear posture review, Cartwright said. U.S. defense planners are now seeking to tailor our deterrence for the types of actors that were not present during the Cold War but are going to be present in the future, Cartwright said. And, it will be the sailors that will make the difference in deterrence, not necessarily just the platforms, Cartwright said of the Navys future nuclear-deterrent mission. The 14 nuclear-missile carrying Trident submarines based here and at other Navy ports provide more than half of Americas strategic deterrent capability, Kings Bay officials said. The application of deterrence can be actually more complicated in the 21st century, but some fundamentals dont change, Air Force Gen. Kevin P. Chilton, commander of U.S. Strategic Command, said. And, the underlying strength of our deterrence force remains the nuclear deterrent force that we have today. The Trident submarine strategic missile force is absolutely essential to Americas nuclear-deterrent capability, Chilton said. And, its not just to deter nuclear conflict, he said of the Tridents mission. These forces have served to deter conflict in general, writ large, since theyve been fielded. The U.S. government agreed to reduce the number of its strategic-missile submarines as part of the 1992 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty. Consequently, four of the Navys 18 Trident submarines were modified to exchange their nuclear missiles for Tomahawk-guided cruise missiles. These vessels carry the designator SSGN. In 2006, the USS Ohio was converted into a guided-missile submarine. At the news conference, Roughead said the Navy is really pleased with the converted Trident submarines, which also carry a contingent of special operations troops, as well as the Tomahawks. That [type of] submarine has performed extremely well, Roughead said of the cruise-missile carrying Tridents. The facility here was established in 1980, replacing a closed U.S. ballistic submarine facility that had been based in Rota, Spain. In 1989, USS Tennessee was the first Trident submarine to arrive at the facility. Another Trident training facility is based in Bangor, Wash. |
We don’t need no steeking subs.
We can depend of presidential charm to protect us.
Absolutely, I foresee some kind of Rainbow powered craft to patrol our seas. Possibly manned by Unicorns.
Taking bets on the day 0bummer cancels any discussion of a new sub.
No problem. We can borrow the money from China.
Greg, Greg Gutfeld is that you?
I really hope that one of those Tridents, instead of being scrapped, is converted to a scientific boat. The value to oceanography would be immense, and it could perform very practical missions as well.
For example, working in concert with a surface ship, it could extend the mission time of deep sea submersibles, and recover objects too large and heavy for them to bring up. It could also guide “entombment” projects with undersea concrete to cover nuclear and hazardous waste disposal sites. In the days of the Soviet Union, entire nuclear reactors were dumped into the Arctic ocean, now presenting a serious hazard.
It would also be of great value with undersea mining operations perhaps worth billions of dollars.
Heck, we can have China build ‘em, and outsource operations to India!
“Absolutely, I foresee some kind of Rainbow powered craft to patrol our seas. Possibly manned by Unicorns.”
Not a chance. The “ducks and bunnies” class of frigate will be the new standard for warships. As I understand it, the technology came from Obamastan.
As a side note, best view of Kings Bay... There is a skydiving place that uses a runway adjacent to the base. I highly recommended it if your ever in the area... or if you work there. :)
We won’t need strategic sub launched nukes when we can just go to the UN for protection or maybe buy “protection” from the Chinese.
Under Obama's administration, Zell Miller's "spit ball" prediction may just come true.
Convert them into ash trays or something......(sarc)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.