Ergo, my position that he didn't destroy Obama.
You asked roamer_1 to prove that Keyes beat Obama in the debates. The proof of that is well established.
To address the other matter of "destroying" Obama in the election: I assert that no one could have beat him, given his unfair advantage. The media gave him "rock star" status early on. The man then rode that wave to the White House--despite being a lowly state senator just five short years ago.
This is obvious to everyone.
Ergo, my position that he didn't destroy Obama.
So a rock-ribbed Conservative was unable to beat a far left Liberal in bright blue Illinois, with the added duress of being begged in by the corrupt and defamed local Republicans with just 90 days to go, and hitting the ground cold in a strange state. Gee, Who'da thunk it?
How does that bear on his debating prowess? What does that prove against his arguments?