Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts

“but also the scientific evidence against it.”

As worded that means NOT teaching ID.


4 posted on 02/19/2009 4:13:04 PM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ColdWater

==Darwin’s theory of evolution and the scientific evidence that supports it

As worded that means NOT teaching Darwin’s fanciful creation myth.


8 posted on 02/19/2009 4:16:11 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: ColdWater

It should include teaching enough about ID, so that students can say why it isn’t a scientific theory.

It helps to provide both examples, and non-examples to teach about any concept. If you wish to teach why evolution is a scientific theory — it would help to be able to distinguish it from theories you don’t consider scientific.

Please note, the above concerns pedagogy only — it isn’t meant to be a comment on the substantive issues (between evolution, and ID, etc.).


11 posted on 02/19/2009 4:21:06 PM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson