Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ebiskit

You are not impressing me. I have been coming to FR for a long time, but you are going to have to come up with coherent sensible arguments against this government. There is no shortage of such arguments, but this paranoia is NOT going to win elections, and what you are spouting is paranoia. You are trying to scare people about vague shadows in the dark, when what people ought to be concerned with is the obvious stuff happening in broad daylight.

I will say it again: Net Neutrality is the Libertarian position on the internet. If you favor freedom of speech, and see the internet as a part of the public sphere where speech should be free, you support Net Neutrality. Opponents of Net Neutrality are corporations with a specific self interest in gaining control over how content is allowed to pass over the web. “Legal device” means an FCC approved Modem. “Legal content” means No Kiddie Porn, as before.

I really fear for the future of my Republican Party if this is the sort of paranoid lunacy that is going to pass for political debate under this government.


92 posted on 02/20/2009 7:31:02 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: babble-on

The intent was not to impress, only to convey my deep concern over numerous Neo-Soc pols calling for the suppression of online disssent/free speech by some Orwellian bureaucratic committee.

This legislation sets up the framework for just that, as evidenced by the clear lack of a definition for this administration’s take on Net Neutrality. The lack of a concrete legal definition allows for open season on political content.

It is my thoughtful consideration of Obama’s penchant for clearing the field of political opposition, along with my research on the Fabian Society and the Cloward-Piven Strategy, that led me to my so-called spouts of paranoia.

Not to mention the Rep. Kanjorski(D) video. Have you seen it?

Rep. Kanjorski: $550 Billion Disappeared in “Electronic Run On the Banks” ( Sept 15,2008)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2187175/posts

In your valued estimation, what “obvious stuff happening in broad daylight” should I be concerned over then?

Acorn’s proven voter fraud?

Maxine Waters calling for energy company socialization?

What color are your spectacles?

Up is down, left is right, black is white and cats are sleeping with dogs. My crazy is just a state of your mind. BOO!!!

Calling your debate opponents ‘crazy’ is long standing tactic of the Alinsky-left and will only earn you derision befitting a troll.

thaDeetz


93 posted on 02/20/2009 11:37:28 AM PST by ebiskit (South Park Republican ( I see Red People ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson