hey, loony toons. You are completely mixed up on what Net Neutrality means. You have it 180 degrees backwards. Its the OPPONENTS of net neutrality who what the right to filter and control what content you see. Its the Telecom companies that are fighting net neutrality because they want to be able to jam commercials at you.
As far as the stimulus package, a democratically elected government passed it and if we don’t like it, we have to elect different people. There was nothing sneaky about it though.
“There was nothing sneaky about it though.”
Other than a complete lack of debate on one of numerous highly contentious issues that had no business being in a so-called stimulus bill. . . Nah. . . there was nothing at all “sneaky” about it.
The trillion dollar price tag was only a legislative false-flag/red-herring.
There is even an anti 2nd Amendment provision hidden deep in the fine print.
“...Who defines “lawful Internet content” and/or “legal devices?”...”
. . . looks like the Dems got that market cornered for a spell; all based on a slick ad campaign, an empty-suited “magic negro” and the Fabian inspired Cloward-Piven Strategy.
There is nothing at all devious about false-flag political strategies. . . /s
thaDeetz