Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ebiskit

this is the opposite of the Fairness Doctrine. Net Neutrality means the internet provider CANNOT filter what goes over the net. If you want a free and open internet, YOU ARE IN FAVOR OF NET NEUTRALITY.


51 posted on 02/18/2009 2:50:01 PM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: babble-on; All

With the left’s unceasing desire to curtail free-speech, you’ll have to pardon my extreme circumspection as it pertains to unread emergency legislation; legislation which was passed without the much heralded 5 day online b1tch period.

Especially since. . .

“recipients must operate broadband and high-speed wireless networks on an “open access basis.” The FCC, soon to be under Democratic control, is charged with deciding what that means. Congress didn’t see fit to include a definition.”

Like I said, platitudinous language which can be used as the Dems see fit.

Sure, the donkeys are just looking out for our ability to offer full-throated dissent.

Have you not been listening to Waxman’s recent comments?


57 posted on 02/18/2009 3:40:50 PM PST by ebiskit (South Park Republican ( I see Red People ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: babble-on

“..this is the opposite of the Fairness Doctrine. Net Neutrality means the internet provider CANNOT filter what goes over the net. If you want a free and open internet, YOU ARE IN FAVOR OF NET NEUTRALITY.”

The Messiah just rammed $787 Billion down our throats on the basis of “trust me” and now, you want us to just trust him on his law professor’s interpretation of the Net Neutrality provisions? I don’t think so.


84 posted on 02/19/2009 5:40:19 AM PST by Rembrandt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson