Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Eight Congressional Democrats propose 0.25% transaction tax on stocks
THOMAS (Library of Congress) ^ | February 18, 2009 | reaganaut1

Posted on 02/18/2009 5:24:42 AM PST by reaganaut1

...

(5) The easiest method to raise the money from Wall Street is a securities transfer tax, a tax that has a negligible impact on the average investor.

(6) This transfer tax would be on the sale and purchase of financial instruments such as stock, options, and futures. A quarter percent (0.25 percent) tax on financial transactions could raise approximately $150 billion a year.

(7) The United States had a transfer tax from 1914 to 1966. The Revenue Act of 1914 (Act of Oct. 22, 1914 (ch. 331, 38 Stat. 745)) levied a 0.2 percent tax on all sales or transfers of stock. In 1932, Congress more than doubled the tax to help overcome the budgetary challenges during the Great Depression.

(8) All revenue generated by this transfer tax should be deposited in the general fund of the Treasury of the United States, scaled to meet the net cost of these bailouts, and phase out when the cost of the bailouts are repaid.

(Excerpt) Read more at thomas.loc.gov ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: moneylist; stocks; transactiontax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
Since Wall Street contributed more to Dems this cycle, they deserve this, but America's investors do not.
1 posted on 02/18/2009 5:24:42 AM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

A new reason to get gold/metals and wait this thing out for at least 5 years or until Sarah wins and starts to fix this horrible mess


2 posted on 02/18/2009 5:27:16 AM PST by prismsinc (A.K.A. "The Terminator"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The stock business would move offshore so fast there would be a whoooshing sound blowing down Wall Street.


3 posted on 02/18/2009 5:28:40 AM PST by gridlock (QUESTION AUTHORITY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

the ‘rats are doing exactly the opposite to fix the stupid economic incentives the government has set up...

down, down, down the ‘rat hole we go...


4 posted on 02/18/2009 5:29:19 AM PST by FreedomProtector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

It would be funny, except it is true. I keep pinching myself, but I cannot seem to wake from this nightmare.


5 posted on 02/18/2009 5:29:39 AM PST by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Doesn’t concern me, as I won’t be buying stocks anytime soon.

An ammo tax increase would concern me.


6 posted on 02/18/2009 5:30:16 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (If guns cause crime, then all of mine are defective.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

If it moves tax it, if it still breathes, tax it again. If it dies, regulate it.

Democrats are simple organisms, raise taxes, fund socialism(fast becoming Fascism) and gun control. You connect the dots.


7 posted on 02/18/2009 5:30:40 AM PST by Tarpon (If you don't stand on principle, you stand for nothing at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomProtector

By all means, let’s do what they did in 1932...


8 posted on 02/18/2009 5:32:09 AM PST by gridlock (QUESTION AUTHORITY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: prismsinc

Are you sure that the leftist majority will even allow future national elections to occur?


9 posted on 02/18/2009 5:33:13 AM PST by johnthebaptistmoore (Conservatives obey the rules. Leftists cheat. Who probably has the political advantage?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon

Buy anything but American Stocks. Gold, Silver are good buys. Short American stocks ( really the whole country).


10 posted on 02/18/2009 5:33:24 AM PST by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

More hopey changey.

The bank of Stearns and Foster is looking more attractive every day.


11 posted on 02/18/2009 5:33:35 AM PST by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

these idiots talk like “Wall Street” is some fat cat rich entity that pay taxes

“Wall Street” is millions of individuals, most of them not rich

I wonder how the teacher’s unions and other pension funds that make up “wall Street” will appreciate paying a transaction tax every time fund assets are bought sold or exchanged


12 posted on 02/18/2009 5:34:41 AM PST by silverleaf ("Men are not angered by mere misfortune but by misfortune conceived as injury" - Screwtape)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The sad thing is that a financial transaction tax is probably a good idea — as a replacement for existing taxes. While all taxes are bad, a financial transaction tax is significantly less bad in that it doesn’t punish work or encourage inefficient behavior to the degree that the income tax, FICA tax, corporate tax or capital gains tax does.


13 posted on 02/18/2009 5:35:05 AM PST by ChicagoHebrew (Hell exists, it is real. It's a quiet green meadow populated entirely by Arab goat herders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

LOL! No tax when you move assets from one side of Stearns and Foster to the other


14 posted on 02/18/2009 5:35:30 AM PST by silverleaf ("Men are not angered by mere misfortune but by misfortune conceived as injury" - Screwtape)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

No I am sticking with old glory. We will find a way through. I do own gold though ^_^


15 posted on 02/18/2009 5:36:04 AM PST by Tarpon (If you don't stand on principle, you stand for nothing at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

From the link...

“This Act may be cited as the `Let Wall Street Pay for Wall Street’s Bailout Act of 2009’.”

Once again the Rats lie. Wall St. would not pay this. It would be passed to the consumer(investor.)

Also, this would not pay for the bailout. It would go to the Treasury’s ‘general fund’ to pay for whatever the rats want. Spit.


16 posted on 02/18/2009 5:37:54 AM PST by gate2wire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The Democrats really want to see Dow 6000 by year end, don’t they?


17 posted on 02/18/2009 5:39:04 AM PST by TheWasteLand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoHebrew

“The sad thing is that a financial transaction tax is probably a good idea — as a replacement for existing taxes.”

Aye, and therein lies the rub. It will not be a replacement for existing taxes, it will be in addition to all existing taxes. It will be adding insult to injury.


18 posted on 02/18/2009 5:39:12 AM PST by flaglady47 (Four years of captivity, no relief in sight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TheWasteLand

The Dow more realistically will finish 2009 at 3500-4000.


19 posted on 02/18/2009 5:44:32 AM PST by alli133
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Something like 80% of the “transfers” that take place on “Wall Street” are very short term trades. These short term trades provide the liquidity necessary to keep markets from becoming wildly volatile (there is somebody there to buy when you want to sell even when the market is declining). A 1/4% tax would dramatically - prohibitively - increase these traders cost of doing business, would drive them out of the market, and would thus raise the cost of capital for every business in the United States. This is a very bad, very poorly thought out idea. They are simply searching for any means of raising taxes that can be attached to a fashionable boogey man so the sheeple will praise them as they tank our country.
20 posted on 02/18/2009 5:52:26 AM PST by cdrw (Freedom and responsibility are inseparable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson