Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
"But but but according to the holy principle of uniformitarianism, this couldn’t have happened anywhere else on the earth, not ever, not at all! /typical evo Except maybe the grand canyon. Evo's still can't explain where billions of tons of silt from billions of years of erosion are that should be at the mouth of river where it dumps into the Pacific.
27 posted on 02/16/2009 10:22:00 AM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Nathan Zachary
Evo's still can't explain where billions of tons of silt from billions of years of erosion are that should be at the mouth of river where it dumps into the Pacific.

It would probably help if you asked a geologist questions about erosion and earth, rather than a biologist.

32 posted on 02/16/2009 10:30:26 AM PST by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Nathan Zachary

“Evos” have nothing to do with this discussion. This post is about the age of the earth. However, your post does spring from the same incredible set of misperceptions that spawn such questions as, “If evolution really happened, why are there still monkeys, huh? Gotcha!”


37 posted on 02/16/2009 10:36:48 AM PST by Buck W. (BHO: Selling hope, keeping the change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Nathan Zachary
Except maybe the grand canyon. Evo's still can't explain where billions of tons of silt from billions of years of erosion are that should be at the mouth of river where it dumps into the Pacific.

Shhhhhh, don't ask questions like that. It makes you sound unscientific.

/sarc

40 posted on 02/16/2009 10:40:20 AM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Nihil utile nisi quod honestum - Marcus Tullius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Nathan Zachary
Except maybe the grand canyon. Evo's still can't explain where billions of tons of silt from billions of years of erosion are that should be at the mouth of river where it dumps into the Pacific.

Considering the Colorado Delta used to cover nearly 2 million acres, I'd say that's a pretty flimsy argument on your part. Just because it's hard to tell there is a delta there now because the entire river is diverted before it reaches the Sea of Cortez does not mean there is not a broad area of delta sediments.

197 posted on 02/17/2009 2:12:34 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson