To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
"But but but according to the holy principle of uniformitarianism, this couldnt have happened anywhere else on the earth, not ever, not at all! /typical evo Except maybe the grand canyon. Evo's still can't explain where billions of tons of silt from billions of years of erosion are that should be at the mouth of river where it dumps into the Pacific.
To: Nathan Zachary
Evo's still can't explain where billions of tons of silt from billions of years of erosion are that should be at the mouth of river where it dumps into the Pacific. It would probably help if you asked a geologist questions about erosion and earth, rather than a biologist.
To: Nathan Zachary
“Evos” have nothing to do with this discussion. This post is about the age of the earth. However, your post does spring from the same incredible set of misperceptions that spawn such questions as, “If evolution really happened, why are there still monkeys, huh? Gotcha!”
37 posted on
02/16/2009 10:36:48 AM PST by
Buck W.
(BHO: Selling hope, keeping the change.)
To: Nathan Zachary
Except maybe the grand canyon. Evo's still can't explain where billions of tons of silt from billions of years of erosion are that should be at the mouth of river where it dumps into the Pacific. Shhhhhh, don't ask questions like that. It makes you sound unscientific.
/sarc
To: Nathan Zachary
Except maybe the grand canyon. Evo's still can't explain where billions of tons of silt from billions of years of erosion are that should be at the mouth of river where it dumps into the Pacific. Considering the Colorado Delta used to cover nearly 2 million acres, I'd say that's a pretty flimsy argument on your part. Just because it's hard to tell there is a delta there now because the entire river is diverted before it reaches the Sea of Cortez does not mean there is not a broad area of delta sediments.
197 posted on
02/17/2009 2:12:34 PM PST by
dirtboy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson