Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dfwgator

Mutual funds were supposed to be the savior for amateurs. Spread the risk, diversify across sectors.


55 posted on 02/16/2009 11:55:17 AM PST by listenhillary (Rahm Emmanuel slip - A crisis is a terrible thing to waste.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: listenhillary

Good mutual funds did what they were designed to do. They do spread risk and diversify.

However, the key diversification is asset classes, which diversification usually occurs before you get into any one mutual fund. So, if a person was well diversified among Cash, Bond, U.S. Stocks, International Stocks, and perhaps alternate investment classes (commodities, gold, etc.) then Mutual Funds performed as expected.

Good mutual funds also keep costs low and at least mimic their benchmark. It is rare for any mutual fund to regularly exceed its benchmark.

I will agree with you though that the average dude is not capable of making good portfolio allocation decisions. The only thing worse than stupid people mucking with their 401Ks is people expecting Social Security to pay out. On the whole, I’d prefer people be left with the freedom to make mistakes, rather than centralize assured mistakes in a government somewhere.


57 posted on 02/16/2009 1:02:25 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (A trillion here, a trillion there, and pretty soon youÂ’re talking about Zimbabwe money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson