Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nyconse

Great idea, because that RINO “moderate” DeWine sure did spectacularly in 2006.


147 posted on 02/16/2009 11:40:55 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj

DeWine lost because conservative Republicans didn’t support him and some nasty GOP scandals in Ohio...and Sen. Brown is so much better right? The stimulus went through with one vote...Browns. Voinivich didn’t support the stimulus...doubt DeWine would have either, but Brown did. I guess those conservative Ohioans who didn’t vote for DeWine...were really smart right? We are so much better off with Brown?

“DeWine lost his third-term re-election bid in 2006, amid Republican scandals not of his making and a state ready for a partisan change in Washington. But DeWine also battled conservatives’ criticism that he was too moderate and too easily made deals with the likes of Democratic Sen. Edward Kennedy.

Sound familiar? One thing that outraged conservatives about DeWine was his joining with McCain in the bipartisan “Gang of 14” senators trying to forge a compromise on President Bush’s judicial nominees.

GOP conservatives helped chop down DeWine, though Democrat Sherrod Brown ran a good campaign and DeWine argues it was a race no Republican could win that year.”


153 posted on 02/16/2009 11:55:46 AM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson