Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the OlLine Rebel
He wrote NUCLEAR deterrent, not “Trident deterrent”.

It was "Trident nuclear deterrent."

106 posted on 02/15/2009 6:38:49 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: Gondring

Nope.

“this amounts to 25% of the UK’s nuclear deterrent”

He meant that the 16 missiles - which happen to be Tridents in this story - are 25% of the UK’s TOTAL deterrent of the nuclear type, not Trident type specifically. When he mentioned land-based he again wrote nothing about any of them being Trident.


109 posted on 02/15/2009 7:07:55 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson