Posted on 02/15/2009 5:04:01 AM PST by kellynla
Edited on 02/15/2009 5:31:31 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
LOS ANGELES - The doctor who helped Nadya Suleman get pregnant with octuplets has reportedly transferred at least seven embryos to another patient.
According to the Los Angeles Times , a woman in her late 40s went to Dr. Michael Kamrava hoping to become pregnant with one baby.
(Excerpt) Read more at myfoxny.com ...
I think Kamrava needs to be charged child support.
Thrice is not coincidence.
These women are being bred. Jihad, anyone?
So who payed for the embryo transfer?
Disgusting. Even more proof that people on welfare are obviously incapable of controlling themselves and need to be sterilized!
You, me and everyone else in the USA who pays taxes.
This guy’s license should be lifted.
They’re already sterile - that’s why they’re having IVF procedures. An interesting outcome, now that I think about it, for those who suggest that sterilizing poor people will save the taxpayers money. IVF and the resulting premature, large-multiple births are much more expensive than births that result from natural processes.
I bet this is the same story we saw posted a few times over the past few days. The late forties woman with 4, that is hospitalized on public funds because she has no insurance.
So, at least it's not everybody; just the taxpayers. That's a relief. Although, I suppose you could say that other government dependents recieved less. We'll just need to print more money.
This amazing phenomenon is giving new meaning to the James Bondian term “Octopussy”!
In every case, I think IVF should be banned. It often exposes both child and mother to enhanced risk; it often deliberately excludes the natural father, thus depriving the child's right to identity and provision based on the paternal relation; and it always, inherently, demeans the child by begetting him/her as an experiment, a product, or a possession.
The additional issue of deliberately bringing children into existence to be dependents on Holy Mother the State is just another facet of an already-pervasive derangement.
You did!!
Agreed, you need to dance with what god gave you!!
Good point. I was not thinking about those other situations, many of which also produce children who will be supported by the taxpayer rather than by their parent(s).
Regarding the rest of your post, I agre.
No, they are not sterile as a whole. Many women who have IVF have gone on to have natural pregnancies. Sterile means no eggs and no sperm, in which case, pregnancy is impossible without the use of donor eggs or sperm, or embryo adoption.
By that definition, I was certainly in error. However, by that definition, most "sterilizations" are not, since tubal ligation, among other procedures, does not stop egg production.
On a related point, it's interesting that proposals to "sterilize" the poor are rarely directed at men, only at women. Fiscally impractical, one would think, since one man can father many more offspring than one woman can deliver. The procedure is also much cheaper.
As for other factors such as blocked tubes, etc., that's referred to as 'unexplained infertility with underlying condition'. Trust me on this. I have endometriosis and am all to familiar with this term. I am still fertile, but another condition is making the likelihood of a natural pregnancy very difficult, if not impossible. Men can also be classified as 'sterile' and yet become fathers through IVF.
I don't think IVF is an evil thing. It helps so many couples become parents. Its the whack jobs like this doctor and Octopussy mom that ruin it those who are sincere and want to have a family.
I have a friend who had to use IVF due to male factor infertility (basically no sperm). She had two girls via IVF and had a very unexpected natural pregnancy. They were so thrilled, especially when doctors told them it would never happen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.