Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance; LucyT; BP2
They are not entitled to claim attorneys fees now because The defendant's lawyers had not requested affirmative relief in their answers -- which were all Motions to Dismiss. They did not specifically claim them in any of the previous cases brought by Keyes, or any other plaintiff against the Obama on basically the same, exact complaint. See Stockman v. Downs & Downs

http://www.law.fsu.edu/library/flsupct/75635/75635rep.pdf

124 posted on 02/14/2009 3:51:37 PM PST by Polarik ("A forgery created to prove a claim repudiates that claim")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Polarik

Yeah. I think it’s nothing but lawyers seeing if they could bluff them out.

As Lenin told his thugs, “Probe with bayonets. If you encounter mush, proceed. If steel, withdraw.”

Or something to that effect.


125 posted on 02/14/2009 3:56:56 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The protection of unalienable rights is the sworn duty of all, at every level of government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson