To: Swordmaker
I think that the anti-trust people would have a lot to say to Microsoft if they did that...So, how is that any different from what Apple does? As I understand it, Apple REFUSES to license its OS to run on any other platform than its own.
70 posted on
02/14/2009 11:37:42 AM PST by
Fresh Wind
(Hey, Obama! Where's my check?)
To: Fresh Wind
Apple doesn't control market share like MS does. However, they do get sued on a regular basis.
If Apple controlled 85% of the platform market, they'd probably be in anti-trust trouble for the Apple Stores.
That being said, Anti-Trust laws are very inconsistent in application.
77 posted on
02/14/2009 1:22:29 PM PST by
Richard Kimball
(We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
To: Fresh Wind
So, how is that any different from what Apple does? As I understand it, Apple REFUSES to license its OS to run on any other platform than its own. Apple has not been convicted for being a monopoly using anti-competitive practices against competitors.
Apple has the RIGHT to define how its copyrighted and patented intellectual property is used. That's protected in the Constitution.
78 posted on
02/14/2009 1:27:14 PM PST by
Swordmaker
(Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson