[swain_forkbeard]

Yes definitely. We need a government agency to decide who can and cannot have children.

You must be joking.

[gimme1ibertee]

You must be joking.

The joke is on the taxpayer who has to support these fatherless children-and it's a joke that has never been funny.In order to receive implantation you should be able to show you are in a stable relationship in order to provide a healthy enviornment for a child or children,as the case may be. You have to be able to pass certain standards in order to adopt a German Shepherd from the local Humane Society,but not to have embryos implanted.That's just WRONG.

[Hildy]

Of course not..but we should not allow elective procedures to be paid by medicaid.

[duckman]

“You must be joking.”
I am against this type of regulation. However how do you stop doctors from giving people children they did not want? I am sure the lady who wanted 1 child and received 4 was not prepared to take care of that many. IMO

[Cherokee Conservative]

“Yes definitely. We need a government agency to decide who can and cannot have children.

You must be joking.”

Several freepers have suggested forced sterilization, and just taking peoples children away and giving them to someone else. We’re headed back to the 1920’s I guess, when Eugenics was all the rage, and useless eaters needed to be killed and sterilized. I wish people would read their history on this. They’d be more careful about what they propose to deal with it. It makes Conservatives sound flat evil sometimes.