Posted on 02/12/2009 6:41:05 AM PST by knighthawk
Just in, Wilders landed at 15:15 at Heathrow and was arrested.
That’s exactly why he continued with the trip in the first place. Condell should have something good to say about this.
UPDATE: Wilders told AP that he is forced to leave the UK within 1 hour.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
What he should do is immediately get on another flight to the UK.
Keep repeating: arrive, get deported ; arrive, get deported; etc. etc.
Eventually this shameful cowardly act will get the world wide attention it deserves.
So when do they start rounding up the “gays” as “islamophobes?”
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7885918.stm
Banned Dutch MP held at Heathrow
A Dutch MP who called the Koran a “fascist book” is to be sent back to the Netherlands after attempting to defy a ban on entering the UK.
Freedom Party MP Geert Wilders was invited to show his controversial film - which links the Islamic holy book to terrorism - in the UK’s House of Lords.
But Mr Wilders, who faces trial in his own country for inciting hatred, has been denied entry by the Home Office.
He is currently being questioned by immigration officials at Heathrow.
The Dutch Ambassador was also at Heathrow to make clear his government’s opposition to the ban on Mr Wilders entering the UK.
‘Free speech’
Mr Wilders’ film Fitna caused outrage across the Muslim world when it was posted on the internet last year.
He was invited to the House of Lords by the UK Independence Party’s Lord Pearson.
The peer said it was a “matter of free speech”, telling the BBC: “We are going to show it anyway because we think MPs and peers should see this film.”
He added: “The film isn’t offensive unless you are a violent Islamist. Most of my Muslim friends think it’s a very good film.”
Fitna’s opening scenes show a copy of the Koran followed by footage of the 9/11 attacks in the US and the bombings in Madrid in 2004 and London in 2005.
The Dutch prime minister has said the film serves “no purpose other than to offend”.
Foreign Secretary David Miliband told the BBC’s Hardtalk: “The home secretary made a decision on an individual case as she is required to do.”
He added that the film contained “extreme anti-Muslim hate and we have very clear laws in this country”.
Mr Miliband also said: “We have profound commitment to freedom of speech but there is no freedom to cry ‘fire’ in a crowded theatre and there is no freedom to stir up hate, religious and racial hatred, according to the laws of the land.”
The Home Office said there was a blanket ban on Mr Wilders entering the UK under EU laws enabling member states to exclude someone whose presence could threaten public security.
“The government opposes extremism in all forms,” it said in a statement, adding that it had tightened up rules on excluding those engaging in “unacceptable behaviour” in October.
Since Wilders is now unlawfully in Britain, the first thing he should do is call for the overthrow of the British government, and demand hundreds of thousands of pounds in welfare money.
Yes Britain is lost.
You're the one who comes off looking poorly here, not Vanders9.
Translation into English:
The government opposes truth in all forms, it said in a statement, adding that it had tightened up rules on excluding those engaging in truth-telling in October.
Ugh. That is such a perversion of justice.
Let’s take your tax dollars then, and buy Malibu beachfront properties to the Gitmo lads.
Pointing out a disgrace is ok. Phrasing in the form of an envious rant is not. It's a window into a sick mind. Most of the evil in this world, and socialist confiscation and destruction, can be traced back to the sin of envy. It should be called out when it happens. Shame is the antidote to envy.
No only not work....
We are talking about Abu Qatada...
One of the most notorious terrorist in the world.
The only government freebie he should get is a tight rope around his neck.
Not a mansion.
Cheers from a Euroweenie.
British Home Office have no problem admitting to the United Kingdom the likes of Dr Ijaz Mian, who preached as follows at the Ahl-e-Hadith mosque in Derby:
You cannot accept the rule of the kaffir. We have to rule ourselves and we have to rule the others... King, Queen, House of Commons: if you accept it, you are a part of it. If you don’t accept it, you have to dismantle it. So you being a Muslim, you have to fix a target. From that White House to this Black House, we know we have to dismantle it. Muslims must grow in strength, then take over... You are in a situation in which you have to live like a state-within-a-state - until you take over.
And so it goes: Multiculti England will tolerate any intolerance, except the guy who points out the intolerance. We can’t tolerate that.
http://corner.nationalreview.com/
You wouldn’t be annoyed that a scumball like that is being paid more money by the government in welfare benefits and a local government provided house for doing f((( all except promote terrorism, than you earn through honest labour?
Damn right he should be annoyed, especially as its his hard-earned tax money that is helping to pay for said scumball’s overlavish lifestyle.
Nobody (least of all a terrorist promoter and sympathiser) should get more money in welfare for sitting on their arse than somebody who is actually working. That isn’t envy, that is just common sense....
My son was telling me about this last night. Evidently, this guy has made an anti-Muslim film about the Islamic take over in the Netherlands. He is very anti-Muslim because his father or someone was killed there, by Muslims, for making anti-Muslim statements or writings.
I wasn’t being envious, I have no problem with people who are more skilled, smarter, more ambitious and/or work harder than me being rewarded more for it. What gets my goat is that this guy gets all of that and not only does nothing useful to earn it, but in fact is positively working to destroy what I believe in!
I’m not envious - I’m angry. Wouldn’t you be? As a taxpayer, I’m paying for that man to live in better housing, doing less work, and in better conditions than I am. That (and only that) is the reason I detailed my financial situation. Actually, I am happy with my lot in life, because I don’t value material possessions particularly highly.
About the same time the muslims get rounded up as homophobes.
Liberals are able to hold completely contrary positions at the same time, providing they both oppose conservatives.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.