Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: r9etb
The location is not at all suspicious -- it's a simple matter of orbital mechanics.

Of course it is *IF* the Russians were somehow able to lower or raise their satellite's orbit. They *may* have selected this particular satellite (COSMOS 2215) precisely because its orbit could potentially intersect with the U.S. (Iridium) satellite's over Siberia where they could more easily monitor a collision (if the altitude was 'adjusted' just right). However, based on an excerpt I followed up with from the Space.com article, the Russian satellite was apparently 'non-maneuverable'. But I don't buy that quite yet.

67 posted on 02/12/2009 8:35:42 AM PST by ETL (Smoking gun evidence on ALL the ObamaRat-commie connections at my newly revised FR Home/About page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: ETL
Of course it is *IF* the Russians were somehow able to lower or raise their satellite's orbit.

Which they apparently could not.

You're making this way too complicated. An accidental collision is a far more plausible explanation for what happened.

68 posted on 02/12/2009 8:52:42 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson