Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Satellite Destroyed in Space Collision
Space.com ^ | 11 February 2009 | Becky Iannotta and Tariq Malik

Posted on 02/12/2009 5:40:00 AM PST by Freeport

WASHINGTON - Iridium Satellite LLC confirmed today that one of its satellites was destroyed Tuesday in an unprecedented collision with a spent Russian satellite and that the incident could result in limited disruptions of service.

According to an e-mail alert issued by NASA today, Russia's Cosmos 2251 satellite slammed into the Iridium craft at 11:55 a.m. EST (0455 GMT) over Siberia at an altitude of 490 miles (790 km). The incident was observed by the U.S. Defense Department's Space Surveillance Network, which later was tracking two large clouds of debris.

"This is the first time we've ever had two intact spacecraft accidentally run into each other," said Nicholas Johnson, chief scientist of NASA's Orbital Debris Program Office at the Johnson Space Center in Houston. "It was a bad day for both of them."

The collision appears to be the worst space debris event since China intentionally destroyed one of its aging weather satellites during a 2007 anti-satellite test, Johnson told SPACE.com. That 2007 event has since left about 2,500 pieces of debris in Earth orbit, but more time is needed to pin down the extent of Tuesday's satellite collision, he added.

(Excerpt) Read more at space.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; Russia
KEYWORDS: collision; cosmos2251; iridium; satellite
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last
To: Cooter

ROFL! Good one ;o)


81 posted on 02/12/2009 9:32:18 AM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a Simple Manner for a Happy Life ;o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: BlueMondaySkipper
But if you had an infinite number objects sent into an infinite number of directions in space, two of them would most definately collide over time.

No, because if you produced an infinite number of objects, they would fill an infinite amount of space. They wouldn't be able to move. :-) ...that is, unless your infinite space is a larger infinity.

Mental exercises dealing with infinity have no bearing on reality.

82 posted on 02/12/2009 9:34:24 AM PST by TChris (So many useful idiots...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

“Given the Russian bird had been orbiting for some 15.6 years, that’s impressive durability for those thrusters and their control system.”

After actually looking at the nearly perpendicular orbits of the two satellites, I don’t really think this was intentional. It would be extremely difficult to pull that off.

Having fuel available after 15 years isn’t too likely either, even if the control system was still working.


83 posted on 02/12/2009 9:38:54 AM PST by EEDUDE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Wow! That’s nearly a 90 degree angle between the two orbits. How many times per second did each satellite get out of its own way? How high was each orbit, measured in satellite diameters? How many times a day did each satellite pass through the point of intersection?


84 posted on 02/12/2009 9:49:53 AM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

“How high was each orbit”

They each orbited in a range (apogee and perigee).

IRIDIUM 33:
Epoch (UTC): 03:48:05, Thursday, February 12, 2009
Eccentricity: 0.0010587
Inclination: 86.391°
Perigee height: 776 km [465 miles]
Apogee height: 791 km [474 miles]
Right Ascension of ascending node: 120.6806°
Argument of perigee: 81.0572°
Revolutions per day: 14.32479644
Mean anomaly at epoch: 279.1894°
Orbit number at epoch: 59767
http://heavens-above.com/orbit.aspx?satid=24946&lat=0&lng=0&loc=Unspecified&alt=0&tz=CET
______________________________________________

COSMOS 2215:
Epoch (UTC): 02:00:40, Thursday, February 12, 2009
Eccentricity: 0.0024852
Inclination: 74.0399°
Perigee height: 767 km [460 miles]
Apogee height: 803 km [482 miles]
Right Ascension of ascending node: 14.7272°
Argument of perigee: 157.0294°
Revolutions per day: 14.32047327
Mean anomaly at epoch: 203.2039°
Orbit number at epoch: 81778
http://heavens-above.com/orbit.aspx?lat=0&lng=0&alt=0&loc=Unspecified&TZ=CET&satid=22675


85 posted on 02/12/2009 11:00:40 AM PST by ETL (Smoking gun evidence on ALL the ObamaRat-commie connections at my newly revised FR Home/About page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: TChris
No, because if you produced an infinite number of objects, they would fill an infinite amount of space. They wouldn't be able to move. :-) ...that is, unless your infinite space is a larger infinity.

They couldn't move because they would be running into each other :-)

86 posted on 02/12/2009 11:15:42 AM PST by BlueMondaySkipper (Involuntarily subsidizing the parasite class since 1981)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Much greater odds but never impossible.

Box battery flak like the Germans used in WWII was also relatively ineffective but tell that to the unlucky ones.

87 posted on 02/12/2009 2:00:28 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ETL; cynwoody; Freeport; All; Everybody
Here is a good site for seeing the orbits of satellites in 3D.

JTrack3d

You can rotate, pick any satellite, zoom in, etc. It is a NASA site.

88 posted on 02/12/2009 6:04:27 PM PST by bigheadfred (Negromancer !!! RUN for your lives !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner; The Louiswu; Freeport; indcons; pfflier; monday
I don't think anyone can say conclusively what the chances of an accidental collision are. There were two known incidents of tracked, (or cataloged) space objects colliding, both involving space junk.

Space Command publishes all known close approaches of unclassified payloads of any kind by any user and all known unclassified objects about a week in advance. (Debris/debris close approaches are ignored.) This gives operators of payloads an opportunity to maneuver to a safer orbit. These predictions are predicated on the assumption that the cataloged objects do not maneuver.

Iridium is a marginally economical operation, living off a Pentagon subsidy in exchange for affording the U.S. military additional capacity. Since Iridium can maneuver, it's failure to do so indicates that the operators did not anticipate any hazard.

Given that the Iridium had a small, but not zero value, to the U.S. military and the “defunct” satellite was Russian, the circumstances are suspect. It should be possible to scrub observations of both vehicles to see if they are even remotely consistent with the hypothesis of an accidental collision. I'll take a wait and see attitude on that.

One cannot completely dismiss the possibility that the defunct Russian vehicle impacted a cataloged or uncataloged debris sometime after the last published predictions and was nudged into the Iridium, but I, for one, see this as very, very unlikely. In the “OJ was framed by racist cops” level of plausibility.

89 posted on 02/14/2009 7:01:42 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (The death cult wants death, the Israelis want peace. I, for one, see only one solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

There were two known previous collisions of tracked objects. This was the first collision of a tracked object with another tracked object that had an active payload.


90 posted on 02/14/2009 7:10:37 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (The death cult wants death, the Israelis want peace. I, for one, see only one solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson