Posted on 02/11/2009 5:24:20 PM PST by pissant
You're kidding, right? I certainly hope so. What would you think of only those serving in the military being allowed to vote (as in Starship Troopers)? After all, they are the ones putting their lives on the line for the country. What sacrifice (or even intelligence) is needed to own property? Heck, even illegal aliens have been allowed to own property.
She really does know to rile them up.
Can you imagine the lawsuits if they ever actually caught her actually speaking/writing an untruth?
Based on his/her/its name, I'd say s/he's Klingon. Probably a really, *really* weak one, too.
Man in driven primarily by logic and reason? Then how do you explain Clinton? What was his primary drive? It certainly wasn't above his waist.
Are you serious? Don't blame this on women. My mom worked with a doctor (male) that fell for the Obama lies. However, it didn't take long for him to see that he drank the koolaid.
What BS! What say you Allegra?
Loretta is a bit intolerant, isn’t she.
I don’t know if they view it as trading freedom for security. I think some might, just as some girly-men might. But I think they are just more apt to be wired to think that government SHOULD care for people, should be compassionate (even though you’re using govt to rob from some to give to others - an act in and of itself not very caring about those they are robbing).
I think a lot of women transfer their submission from a man to the faceless government who can’t control them in the same way, and in that way feel more secure and free to live how they want. Even though they are giving a lot of control over their lives to a bureacracy that is a lot more inflexible than any one man might be.
I would certainly be in favor of anyone in the military being allowed to vote, including any veterans. The caveat is that they need to be doing it other than for getting through college, they need to serve at least 4 years. Even if they are women, I would make that exception.
You are a selective reader. I repeatedly talk about metrosexual guys. Please read more carefully.
[Ignorant people...
Not one thing quoted has anything to do with race]
exactly...so what do you want from academia?
OK, so where’s the “racist” remarks? None of the examples I’ve read refer to anybody’s race.
Of course these liberal colleges are the same that invite Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to speak w/o limitations. Of course let’s not forget “patriots” like Bill Ayers.
Are you serious? Don’t blame this on women.
I figured I’d get some flack about that statement. There is lot’s of blame to spread around but I was merely making the point that scores of otherwise intelligent women voted for that dufus because of either his looks or ability to speak in a calm, reassuring way. I’ll guarantee you that most of these women still “feel” they voted the right way and it won’t matter how much the “One” does to steer our path down the road to full-blown Socialism. Because of my profession I have worked around women for many years and I can tell you that 90% of the personnel problems are catfights between these feline.
Then how do you explain Clinton?
Are you serious? This isn’t even apples to apples! Sure, Clinton deservedly got a reputation for exercising the smaller head but he was still a slick, conniving, thinking man who was aptly given the moniker “Teflon Bill.”
Oh, this guy has displayed his anatomical deficiencies on here before.
He's just another misogynist assuaging his feelings of inadequacy.
A samll boy climbs a tree.
One parent says “wow! I didn’t know you could climb so high” the other parent says “get down from that tree, you’ll hurt yourself!
Indentify which parent is most likely the mother.
I think that’s what I said.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.