Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog

Your thinking of the 23rd ammendment. All that does is give DC electors even though it is not a state. It does not state that DC CANNOT apply for statehood. I’m just saying there is a way they can get senators and representatives while staying within the framework of the Constitution. The Dems are trying to ignore the Constitution and they really dont even have to do that. But they consider the Consitution irrelevant anyway so it doesn’t really surprise me.


77 posted on 02/11/2009 10:41:57 AM PST by CougarGA7 (Wisdom comes with age, but sometimes age comes alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: CougarGA7
"I’m just saying there is a way they can get senators and representatives while staying within the framework of the Constitution."

Nope. The 23rd Amendment has nothing to do with it. The establishment and definition of DC is part of the original Constitution, and it is, by definition, NOT a state. And I see no way it can legitimately be considered a state unless an amendment is passed to allow it.

"The Congress shall have Power To… exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such Dis­trict (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Con­gress, become the Seat of the Gov­ernment of the United States… (The U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 17)"

88 posted on 02/11/2009 12:21:36 PM PST by Wonder Warthog ( The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson