Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: F15Eagle

Yes, I guess it does. But we can always hope against hope.


3 posted on 02/11/2009 2:34:38 AM PST by malkee (Actually I'm an ex-smoker--two and a half years-- But I think about it every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: malkee
"Yes, I guess it does. But we can always hope against hope."

But he already cut off the investigation before it could lead to Obama and he controls what will be presented in court. The only hope I can see is if Blago, himself, somehow blows the top off of everything and publicly reveals a direct link to Obama.

4 posted on 02/11/2009 2:39:19 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: malkee

“Yes, I guess it does. But we can always hope against hope.”

Wasn’t this stated months ago that he would be kept on? (ya, Iknow, promises)

[When I read the headline and response, I thought that Rove was going to be indicted and that Jason Leopold or William Pitt was going to take over as WH spokesperson]


16 posted on 02/11/2009 3:15:07 AM PST by This_far
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: malkee
we can always hope against hope.

You prefer somebody suggested by William Ayres?

17 posted on 02/11/2009 3:37:51 AM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla ("men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters." -- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson