Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘I Won,’ He Explained
National Review ^ | February 8, 2009 | Rich Lowry

Posted on 02/08/2009 5:23:02 PM PST by Steelfish

February 06, 2009

‘I Won,’ He Explained On the stimulus, when Obama says “I won,” he’s out of better arguments.

By Rich Lowry

Barack Obama, a reputed master of the persuasive art, has settled on his central argument for the stimulus bill: I won.

That Obama is reduced to this crude appeal is a symptom of the intellectual collapse of the case for his stimulus bill, a congressional spendfest untethered from its stated goal of providing a rapid “jolt” to the economy.

As far as political arguments go, “I won” has its power—provided it’s made on behalf of an agenda ratified by the American electorate. But Obama didn’t campaign on a sprawling, nearly $1 trillion new spending plan.

If he had pledged in October to double federal domestic discretionary spending in a matter of weeks—including increasing the budget of the National Endowment for the Arts by a third, spending hundreds of millions more on federal buildings and throwing tens of billions on every traditional liberal priority from job training to Pell Grants—he’d have been hard-pressed to win at all.

The president should read the transcript of the third presidential debate. He claimed his program represented “a net spending cut.” He called himself “a strong proponent of pay-as-you-go. Every dollar that I’ve proposed, I’ve proposed an additional cut so that it matches.” He added, “We need to eliminate a whole host of programs that don’t work.”

Now, circumstances change, and no president can adhere to every jot and tittle from his campaign, but the “I won” argument only works if the campaign program matches the governing program. Obama himself seems confused on what exactly “I won” means.

(Excerpt) Read more at article.nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bho44; lowry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: Steelfish

The Prez claims “he won” and overwhelming victory, and that America voted for his agenda...in reality, he squeaked out a victory against a weak opponent in a year when the incumbent was deeply unpopular. Further facts for Obozo to chew on that dispute his mandate for change:

Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law, St.Paul, Minnesota, points out facts of 2008 Presidential election:

Number of States won by:
Democrats: 19
Republicans: 29

Square miles of land won by:
Democrats: 580,000
Republicans: 2,427,000

Population of counties won by:
Democrats: 127 million
Republicans: 143 million

Professor Olson adds:
“In aggregate, the map of the territory Republican won by Republicans was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country.
Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government welfare.”

Explain that, B. Hussein Obama.


21 posted on 02/08/2009 5:43:19 PM PST by Wasichu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

“Obama I won” ping.

Neat observations. He won promising the opposite of this.


22 posted on 02/08/2009 5:45:13 PM PST by sickoflibs (Pelosi: "Create jobs by teaching kids to use condoms in recovery bill ",condom jobs??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Is this my cupie doll?

23 posted on 02/08/2009 5:46:39 PM PST by smokingfrog (Is it just my imagination, or is the water in this pot getting a little to hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

There is no way that even the democrats can be this stupid. They are deliberately trying to bankrupt the country for personal gain.


24 posted on 02/08/2009 5:49:41 PM PST by Soothesayer (The United States of America Rest in Peace November 4 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

That is what the American people should say after they eventually get their way. It might take years, but it will come.


25 posted on 02/08/2009 5:51:41 PM PST by I Hate Obama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
...not king, not dictator, not tribal chieftan...
As president, he's the head of the Executive Branch of our government. Big job, but it doesn't make him an emperor.
26 posted on 02/08/2009 5:56:02 PM PST by ArmyTeach (You have a Republic, Madam, if you can keep it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bikerman

These are the enemies within!


27 posted on 02/08/2009 5:56:58 PM PST by ronnie raygun (Is it time for my medication, reality is starting to set in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
"I believe in common-sense gun safety laws, and I believe in the second amendment," Obama said at a news conference. "Lawful gun owners have nothing to fear. I said that throughout the campaign. I haven't indicated anything different during the transition. I think people can take me at my word."

This little Gem of a bald face lie is next

28 posted on 02/08/2009 5:58:11 PM PST by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ataDude

Great article with a bunch of speaking points for us!

<<<Bookmark for lunch with liberal friends :)


29 posted on 02/08/2009 5:59:19 PM PST by Freedom56v2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Soothesayer

“There is no way that even the democrats can be this stupid.”

When you are blinded by self righteousness, ego. and ideology you can be that stupid.


30 posted on 02/08/2009 5:59:24 PM PST by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: boomop1
He won a ticket to hell...may they go down in flames. The concern is that he will take us down with him ...
31 posted on 02/08/2009 5:59:53 PM PST by ArmyTeach (You have a Republic, Madam, if you can keep it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: philly-d-kidder
I did a quick search on Obama got rolled and this came up:

“People Are Talking About ‘President Pelosi’ Now”

Could it be? Less than two weeks from the inspiring images of the inaugural, has Pres. Obama let the focus of power slip to . . . Nancy Pelosi? So suggested Wall Street Journal editorial board member Holman Jenkins on this evening’s Journal Editorial Report on Fox News Channel. Jenkins presented the news not as his own critique, but as the opinion of erstwhile Obama supporters on Wall Street. JER host Paul Gigot elicited the stunning response with a question playing off a comment by Mary Anastasia O’Grady about the paucity of truly stimulative measures in the supposed stimulus plan.

PAUL GIGOT: As a political matter, Holman, why didn’t President Obama–70% approval rating in the polls–he really could exert some influence over his party on Capitol Hill—he chose not to.

HOLMAN JENKINS: That’s an excellent question. I mean, the Republicans took him at his word. He said that he wanted a non-porky stimulus bill, one without a lot of earmarks. And instead he got–I mean, people on Wall Street who support Mr. Obama, voted for him, gave him money, are talking about ‘President Pelosi’ now. This thing is actually more of a defeat for him I think in the long run than we’re giving it credit for now.

Fellow WSJ board member Stephen Moore, founder and former president of the Club For Growth, fleshed out the portrait of a president who let himself be rolled .

STEPHEN MOORE: Isn’t it unbelievable, Paul? Just nine days ago Barack Obama was coronated; this is a president with 75% approval. Nobody expected this to happen. I think the most stunned person in Washington right now is Barack Obama himself. And the mistake he made was exactly the one that Holman just mentioned—that he allowed Nancy Pelosi and David Obey and all the appropriators to write this bill.

Ed Driscoll: “change has apparently arrived to change the change that just arrived.”

32 posted on 02/08/2009 6:01:24 PM PST by An Old Man (Use it up, Wear it out, Make it do, or Do without.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary

Come to think of it, I was checking out DU to see if they were discussing the Aussie fire and remembered how they used to, and still do, blame President Bush (sigh) for the economy and all the spending. Hmmmmm.


33 posted on 02/08/2009 6:01:53 PM PST by huldah1776 ( Worthy is the Lamb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle

Yes, that could be.


34 posted on 02/08/2009 6:04:54 PM PST by Soothesayer (The United States of America Rest in Peace November 4 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Wasichu
Number of States won by: Democrats: 19 Republicans: 29

That doesn't add up to 50, or even 57 States.

35 posted on 02/08/2009 6:06:02 PM PST by rfp1234 (Phodopus campbelli: household ruler since July 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

They would say it’s still Bush’s fault. (And they are partially right)


36 posted on 02/08/2009 6:06:53 PM PST by listenhillary (Rahm Emmanuel slip - A crisis is a terrible thing to waste.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

.."and soon the American people will know just what your pay grade is"....

37 posted on 02/08/2009 6:08:56 PM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
I have always heard that when a "leader" is reduced to invoking his rank and authority, he has lost any and all arguments to justify his actions.

If folks didn't like "the kenyan" before he said this, they really don't like him now.
38 posted on 02/08/2009 6:12:24 PM PST by FrankR (We are only enslaved to the extent of charity (bailout) we receive...think about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Liberty once lost is lost forever." John Adams, July 7, 1775

39 posted on 02/08/2009 6:13:11 PM PST by Colonial Warrior (Never approach a bull from the front, a horse from the rear, or a fool from any direction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArmyTeach

I think you need to go back and read what I actually wrote. Words are important and mine don’t say what you are intimating they do.


40 posted on 02/08/2009 6:15:02 PM PST by savedbygrace (You are only leading if someone follows. Otherwise, you just wandered off... [Smokin' Joe])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson