Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/08/2009 3:10:07 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: GodGunsGuts
Too bad we can't see 0bama's birth certificate.

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

2 posted on 02/08/2009 3:12:42 PM PST by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB; editor-surveyor; metmom; Alamo-Girl; betty boop; GourmetDan; MrB; valkyry1; ...

ping!


3 posted on 02/08/2009 3:12:42 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

About as convincing as Obama’s birth certificate.
Stick to religion.


4 posted on 02/08/2009 3:12:53 PM PST by Kozak (USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Requiescat In Pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts
Agreed.
The age of the Universe is +/- 13 billion years.
The age of the earth is +/- 4.5 billion years.
The oldest undisputed fossils of primitive life forms found on earth appear in rocks dating from 3.2 billion ago.
8 posted on 02/08/2009 3:23:29 PM PST by Riodacat (Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

This moron is the archtypical loser!

No wonder the church in England is falling apart; what could the church be for without God?


13 posted on 02/08/2009 3:29:07 PM PST by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

Are arguing the earth is only 4,000 ish years old?


14 posted on 02/08/2009 3:29:35 PM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts
Once you let go of the Bible as history, all Christian doctrine begins to disintegrate.

Only for those with weak faith.
15 posted on 02/08/2009 3:29:37 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

Dr Nigel Leaves would fit in well with the Obamination.


16 posted on 02/08/2009 3:31:47 PM PST by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

Sounds like a person who is going to be really surprised about one nanosecond after he dies.


19 posted on 02/08/2009 3:35:37 PM PST by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli now reads "Oil the gun..eat the cannolis.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

Atheists exist all alone in a limited Newtonian universe...everyone else lives in a Quantum universe of limitless possibility.


22 posted on 02/08/2009 3:40:06 PM PST by Bobalu (McCain has been proven to be the rino flop I always thought he was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

“No scientist has any alternative or better ‘birth certificate’ for the earth or the universe. All scientific estimates of earth and universe age require a whole lot of assumptions. The key assumption is uniformitarianism, which is atheism disguised as science, because it assumes no miraculous interventions in history.4 Christians have no reason to accept, and every reason to reject, atheistic assumptions about the universe. “
Using a written record that was transcribed from oral traditions is a dubious ‘birth certificate’. But that is beside the point. The age of the universe and the earth itself and all life on earth are determined by theories backed up by observable and repeatable evidence. Relying on stories written in colorful prose based off of old stories does not prove or disprove anything, it only puts question on those who rely upon it to deny scientific information put before them.
Denying science is a bigger folly than denying god. Saying gravity doesn’t exist doesn’t mean you won’t fall off the cliff.


27 posted on 02/08/2009 3:48:41 PM PST by Nipplemancer (Abolish the DEA !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts
The Scriptures are quite clearly inspired of God, truthful in history, theology, and prophecy.

And the Bible is likewise clear on matters of life, faith, morality, and devotion to God:

The only REAL question is whether a man or a culture accept the Living Word as authoritative -- revealing the Law of Holy God ---
Likewise promising -- in Christ alone -- the purchase of mercy, and forgiveness for all of man's transgressions against that extraordinary revelation of law--

Finally the provision of daily grace that imparts the Holy Spirit into the hearts of all who accept His terms of life -- enabling us to enjoy the coommunal relationship --

And enjoy the blessed promise of eternal life.

It's really a simple clear choice we all make -- in favor of against -- proactively or by default.

Who is on the Lord's side?

31 posted on 02/08/2009 4:00:02 PM PST by Wings-n-Wind (The main things are the plain things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

I like to point out that people today assume that all the people in ancient times were dullards. While many people were, many people today are just as simple. But then and now, it is not the simpletons that make history.

For example, it is now known that the Pentateuch was created as a poem or song. Poetry evolved in preliterate times as a mnemonic device for the accurate retention of information. But illiterate does not mean ignorant or stupid.

For example, some of the most complex philosophical questions ever devised were integrated into the Pentateuch. In his brief conversation between Moses and JHVH, Moses cut to the chase and asked the question whose answer has dominated philosophy ever since.

“I Am that I Am” (Ehyeh asher Ehyeh).

Volumes have been written about the consequences of that single statement. Martin Buber, perhaps the most influential Jewish philosopher of the 20th Century wrote his masterwork “I and Thou” to explain some of the significance of this statement. It is an easy read, and devastatingly hard to fully understand.

When published in 1923, it made a huge splash in the theological community, then was promptly forgotten by the vast majority who just didn’t get it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_and_thou

With that statement, JHVH identifies as a singularity. This means that JHVH can’t have a name, because there is nothing to compare to JHVH. Not with size, shape, color, smell, sound. Anything that can be labeled cannot be JHVH. There cannot be two JHVH.

In turn, according to Kabbalah, this explains the origins of the universe. JHVH wanted to see if there was anything that isn’t JHVH, so JHVH created the universe as a mirror.


32 posted on 02/08/2009 4:01:35 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

Amusing debate.

Note how it’s always the God of Christianity they blast when attacking creation.

You never hear of them slamming the Muslim theory, whatever the heck it is.

Try the Native American theories about foxes and eagles and crawling out of the ground creation stories. Attack those why don’t you, weenies.

You know, diversity.


35 posted on 02/08/2009 4:16:09 PM PST by StAntKnee (It's a show about NOTHING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

“Once you let go of the Bible as history, all Christian doctrine begins to disintegrate.”

If you read the bible as history I think you miss the point. When Jesus fed several thousand people with fish from a basket he wasn’t trying to tell us about himself. It is beside the point whether he actually did it or not, the point of the story is about faith, not about the ability of Jesus to perform miracles.


36 posted on 02/08/2009 4:16:59 PM PST by yazoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts
"Traditional beliefs about God cannot be sustained in the light of the latest scientific and critical thinking."

For which he offers, nor can he offer any proof.

47 posted on 02/08/2009 5:09:15 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts
Once you let go of the Bible as history, all Christian doctrine begins to disintegrate.

Well DUH!

56 posted on 02/08/2009 6:55:49 PM PST by TheHound (You would be paranoid too - if everyone was out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

Where’s the “Aw Jeeze” guy when you need him.

This creationist stuff is a good part of the reason conservatives keep losing elections.


61 posted on 02/08/2009 7:44:09 PM PST by Darwin Fish (God invented evolution. Man invented religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts
The Resurrection of Jesus, an attested fact of history (Acts 17:31)3, is thus our guarantee of the measured biblical time scale for the universe (Luke 24:27,44).

Acts 17:31 is a statement, not a fact.

71 posted on 02/08/2009 9:13:55 PM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson