Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USS Port Royal Grounding
US Naval Institute ^ | 2-2009 | NA

Posted on 02/07/2009 8:13:14 PM PST by buccaneer81

USS Port Royal Gronding Thread from US Naval Institute


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: navy; usn; ussportroyal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 02/07/2009 8:13:14 PM PST by buccaneer81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: buccaneer81

well another skipper bites the dust one more to add to the unemployed list


3 posted on 02/07/2009 8:16:43 PM PST by al baby (Hi mom. I love sarcasim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrPR

Daddy drove a desk and had jr. get command.

The reality of today’s military.


4 posted on 02/07/2009 8:21:33 PM PST by edcoil (Hey, I found my round-tuit, guess I'll go to work now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FrPR

I read earlier that they had pumped off fuel, potable water and unloaded non-essential personnel to the tune of 215 tons in order to help refloat her.


5 posted on 02/07/2009 8:22:06 PM PST by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: al baby

Our Pastor today was really having fun with one of our elders who’s retired Navy. The opening song chosen was “Jesus Savior Pilot Me,” and prior to starting the song, the pastor mentioned that it’s too bad the ship’s captain hadn’t known that one. Our church is only a few miles from Pearl Harbor, and we can see the stuck ship from a couple of vantage points nearby.


6 posted on 02/07/2009 8:24:20 PM PST by BuckyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
Tow lines broke during prior attempts to free the vessel.

Any linehandler remembers that day forever.
7 posted on 02/07/2009 8:29:48 PM PST by Thrownatbirth (.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

I don’t understand off-loading fuel. CGs have seawater compensation systems. The fuel tanks are always full of some combination of seawater and fuel.


8 posted on 02/07/2009 8:31:17 PM PST by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Freedom's Fortress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neodad

awesome a hybrid fuel CG


9 posted on 02/07/2009 8:33:49 PM PST by al baby (Hi mom. I love sarcasim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: al baby

LOL. The ship actually has a deeper draft with no fuel.


10 posted on 02/07/2009 8:35:07 PM PST by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Freedom's Fortress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Thrownatbirth
Any linehandler remembers that day forever.

I bet they check their shorts.

11 posted on 02/07/2009 8:37:53 PM PST by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: neodad
CGs have seawater compensation systems. The fuel tanks are always full of some combination of seawater and fuel.

So if you off load fuel you take on water for ballast?

12 posted on 02/07/2009 8:41:46 PM PST by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Aegis ping


13 posted on 02/07/2009 8:41:58 PM PST by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Freedom's Fortress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby

Does the captain get the new nickname “Lead bottom”?


14 posted on 02/07/2009 8:42:30 PM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

Correct, because the cruisers were so top heavy. I don’t recall if it could be disabled in such a situation.


15 posted on 02/07/2009 8:43:15 PM PST by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Freedom's Fortress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
I bet they check their shorts

I always checked the deck for body parts. The physics are against you in a big way.
16 posted on 02/07/2009 8:57:21 PM PST by Thrownatbirth (.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

I never liked the entrance channel to Pearl. Glad I wasn’t homeported there.

-Retired QMC


17 posted on 02/07/2009 9:07:43 PM PST by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I hate seeing that. Bad for everybody.

But you must admit, a ship grounding is drama.

And for Drama with a capital "D", that has to go to the grounding of the USS Missouri in 1950. I read a book on it full of pictures. This was the one that made an imprint on me:

At one point They ended up with I think 12 fleet tugs (actually, the four pulling might be minesweepers or some auxilliary type) four astern pulling for all they've got and four on each side, alternately pushing together all four on one side, then letting off power, and the four tugs on the other side would then push back in unison.

They would try to rock the battleship back and forth. While they did this, they also had navy divers standing on the bottom (wearing the Navy Mark V diving helmets and gear) on either side of the ship spraying between the mud and the hull with fire hoses to break the suction!!!!

Yikes!

Can you even IMAGINE how dangerous that must have been?

It is simply an amazing story, how it happened with the scene on the bridge reminiscent of "The Caine Mutiny" where the helmsman tries to tell the Captain they are on the wrong side of the channel marker, and the Captain first ignores him then tears him a new asshole. Just amazing.

18 posted on 02/07/2009 9:09:18 PM PST by rlmorel ("A barrel of monkeys is not fun. In fact, a barrel of monkeys can be quite terrifying!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY

15 Years at sea and never homeported at Pearl? Was that unusual?


19 posted on 02/07/2009 9:09:31 PM PST by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: neodad
Wow. I didn't know that. I always thought they were top heavy, but figured they must have had some kind of design feature that made them not as unstable as they appear to be. (not a design feature of depending on your fuel tanks to have to ballast all the time.

What was it like on those in heavy seas? I only have carrier experience, and that doesn't REALLY count in that respect...:)

20 posted on 02/07/2009 9:14:06 PM PST by rlmorel ("A barrel of monkeys is not fun. In fact, a barrel of monkeys can be quite terrifying!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson