Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barney Frank: TARP's comp curbs could be extended to all businesses [socialism gains a BIG toehold]
Financial Week ^ | February 3, 2009 | Neil Roland

Posted on 02/04/2009 2:42:44 PM PST by Technical Editor

Would be part of broader bill limiting hedge funds, credit-raters, and mortgage securitizers; 'deeply rooted anger'

----

Congress will consider legislation to extend some of the curbs on executive pay that now apply only to those banks receiving federal assistance, House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank said.

“There’s deeply rooted anger on the part of the average American,” the Massachusetts Democrat said at a Washington news conference today.

He said the compensation restrictions would apply to all financial institutions and might be extended to include all U.S. companies.

The provision will be part of a broader package that would likely give the Federal Reserve the authority to monitor systemic risk in the economy and to shut down financial institutions that face too much exposure, Mr. Frank said.

Also included in the legislation: registration requirements for hedge funds and proposals aimed at curbing conflicts of interest at credit-rating agencies such as Standard & Poor’s.

The bill, which the committee is working on in consultation with the Obama administration, also will require financial institutions that bundle mortgages into securities to share in potential losses. This would give banks and mortgage-specialists an incentive not to make bad loans, he said. Institutions that securitize loans improperly will incur tougher penalties.

“There have been too few constraints on major financial institutions incurring far more liability than they could handle,” Mr. Frank said.

The committee hopes to have a general outline of the legislation by early April, he said. It will be the panel’s first priority in its effort to restructure financial regulation in the wake of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.

Mr. Frank has summoned the CEOs of Citigroup, J.P. Morgan Chase and the seven other U.S. financial firms that got $125 billion from TARP to testify at a Feb. 11 committee hearing.

Mr. Frank seems to be in synch with the Obama administration in his plans for executive compensation.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said last month that he might try to extend to all U.S. companies a restriction that prohibits bailout banks from taking a tax deduction of more than $500,000 in pay for each executive.

The Troubled Assets Relief Program legislation enacted in October seeks to give companies receiving aid under the $700 billion bailout a number of incentives to curb what it calls excessive executive pay.

Mr. Geithner said he would consider “extending at least some of the TARP provisions and features of the $500,000 cap to U.S. companies generally.”

Under the legislation, banks receiving bailout money must limit golden parachute payments to senior executives to no more than three times the executives’ base pay. The companies also must subject any bonuses or incentives to clawbacks if the payouts are based on bank’s misleading financial statements.

In addition, bailout recipients can’t offer top managers incentives that “encourage unnecessary excessive risks that threaten the value of the financial institution.”

These limits apply to the chief executive officer, chief financial officer and the next three most highly compensated executives in a bank receiving rescue funds.

Mr. Frank said provisions on golden parachute payments and bonus clawbacks would probably be in the legislation, though he declined to provide more detail because “we’re early in the process.”

A congressional oversight panel headed by Harvard Law professor Elizabeth Warren also recommended last week that Treasury consider revoking executive bonuses at failed institutions getting federal aid.

Currently, these institutions must subject bonuses to clawbacks only if the payouts are based on banks’ misleading financial statements.

The top Republican on the committee, Spencer Bachus of Alabama, said last month he has reservations about giving the Fed new powers, such as the authority to monitor systemic risk.

Mr. Frank said today that after lawmakers address issues on systemic risk, they will consider how to bolster investor protection via changes at the Securities and Exchange Commission. The committee also will review proposals to assist struggling homeowners and expand the housing supply, and to strengthen international financial institutions such as the World Bank, he said.

Write to the editors at fw_editor@financialweek.com.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: acorn; barneyfrank; cap; communism; daschole; fanniemae; lping; marxism; obama; pervert; rats; salary; socialism; tarp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last
This isn't being reported in MSM.
1 posted on 02/04/2009 2:42:45 PM PST by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor

Sorry, folks. I see this is a dupe.


2 posted on 02/04/2009 2:44:54 PM PST by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor

Our only hope would be a new amendment. Repealing all Laws, Rules, Regulations and Treaties since 1960.


3 posted on 02/04/2009 2:45:44 PM PST by screaminsunshine (f)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor
He said the compensation restrictions would apply to all financial institutions and might be extended to include all U.S. companies.

What?!

He is nuts! How can he tell anyone what they are allowed to make? If he wants a revolt he can just keep talking like this!

4 posted on 02/04/2009 2:47:40 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor

I have a deeply rooted anger against Bwarney Fwank.


5 posted on 02/04/2009 2:50:07 PM PST by bergmeid (Watchin' Obrother self-destruct)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bergmeid
I have a deeply rooted anger against Bwarney Fwank.

Mither Fwank would be vewwy, vewwy happy if you would.

6 posted on 02/04/2009 2:52:26 PM PST by newgeezer (It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor
"Congress will consider legislation to extend some of the curbs on executive pay that now apply only to those banks receiving federal assistance, House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank said."

Lunatic.

Somehow I suspect that Entertainment Industry salaries and Trial Lawyer fees will be exempted from any of his calculations.
7 posted on 02/04/2009 2:54:15 PM PST by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor

Gotta send this one on.


8 posted on 02/04/2009 2:54:35 PM PST by engrpat (End the National Nightmare on 1-20-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor

We are getting scarily close to a revolution with these a__holes in charge.


9 posted on 02/04/2009 2:55:29 PM PST by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor

The age of insanity has begun.


10 posted on 02/04/2009 2:55:57 PM PST by jveritas (God Bless our brave troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor
The bill, which the committee is working on in consultation with the Obama administration...

Good - Obama's hands will not only touch the final bill but the actual draft. No shirking this for him.

The top Republican on the committee, Spencer Bachus of Alabama, said last month he has reservations about giving the Fed new powers, such as the authority to monitor systemic risk.

I have absolutely no doubt that Mr. Bachus was a little more animated in his "doubts."

These guys couldn't even wait a week before lumping this on the back of TARP bailouts which are the ONLY situation to even consider such measures. And yet I believe the Dems decided to throw this out there for the very reason that many Freepers and others are against the limit of compensation to any institution that recieves TARP funds - execs would simply go to institutions that didn't recieve TARP funds and thus would not be subject to compensation restriction. Now if they socialistically extend this to all businesses then some of the execs will stay put.

11 posted on 02/04/2009 2:58:10 PM PST by torchthemummy (My apologies if this post retreads on ground already covered!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor

Barney Frank is an evil idiot.


12 posted on 02/04/2009 2:58:56 PM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor
They can amend the tax code to restrict all individual earnings from all sources to $500,000 per year. Confiscatory taxation, long a mainstay of the Lunatic Left, SDS and Weathermen alike.

Should go over real big. :)

13 posted on 02/04/2009 2:59:45 PM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor
The bill, which the committee is working on in consultation with the Obama administration, also will require financial institutions that bundle mortgages into securities to share in potential losses. This would give banks and mortgage-specialists an incentive not to make bad loans, he said. Institutions that securitize loans improperly will incur tougher penalties.

What's the word I am looking for...Chutzpah. Didn't this clown oversee the Senate Banking Committee, date the CEO of Fannie Mae, support the CRA, and vilify the very same banks when they refused to make these bad loans to people with no income and bad credit.

The policies of the liberal Democrats that control Congress directly caused this crisis now they have the gonads to tell us they have a solution and the solution is Socialism.

He's right about one thing...the American people are mad as hell. Unfortunately for him and his ilk they are about to find out the anger is not directed where they think it is.

14 posted on 02/04/2009 3:01:37 PM PST by JrsyJack (Oh dem golden slippers!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor

If it wouldn’t crash the economy worse since companies would not longer be able to compete for the best managers... I’d take a certain satisfaction in the pain this would cause wealthy Obama supporters.

And if they do this to business in general, I hope they do it Hollywood.


15 posted on 02/04/2009 3:02:47 PM PST by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor
will require financial institutions that bundle mortgages into securities to share in potential losses

Just end this insane practice already

16 posted on 02/04/2009 3:03:11 PM PST by montag813 (www.FreepShop.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor

I like the Chinese way...the guy responsible for the baby formula disaster was executed. Bernie Madoff should be executed. And congress should establish certain financial crimes as capital offenses.


17 posted on 02/04/2009 3:04:27 PM PST by montag813 (www.FreepShop.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor

Congressional pay, and the pay of Cabinet members and the president, should be cut to zero based on performance. Actually, Congressmorons should reimburse the Treasury all of their pay for the past five years. Obama and the Cabinet have made the economy worse so far, so they should each pay $10,000 a month to the Treasury as a penalty.


18 posted on 02/04/2009 3:05:38 PM PST by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bergmeid

HEY BWARNEY, KISS MY A**, OMG, HE’D LIKE THAT


19 posted on 02/04/2009 3:06:56 PM PST by peace with honor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: indthkr
Somehow I suspect that Entertainment Industry salaries and Trial Lawyer fees will be exempted from any of his calculations.

Clinton tried something like this early in his first administration via the tax code. He exempted one-time shows, like the millions of dollars shows in Vegas.

How about pro athletes? $500,000 is pocket money for them.

20 posted on 02/04/2009 3:08:44 PM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson