Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway; fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued; Impy; JohnnyZ; Clemenza; Coop; Norman Bates; ...

“Brown told the court in a filing that he doesn’t think that Proposition 8 is a constitutional revision or that it violates the constitutional separate of powers. But he said he believes it is unconstitutional because it violates the inalienable right to liberty.”


Let’s see, the only theory under which a California constitutional amendment could be “unconstitutional” under the state constitution is if it was not adopted correctly (such as if it was a “revision” requiring legislative supermajorities for its proposal instead of a plain-vanilla amendment that could be proposed by citizen initiative), and the only way that Prop 8 could be deemed not to have been adopted correctly is if it were deemed to be a constitutional “revision,” and Jerry Brown admits that Prop 8 is *not* a constitutional “revision,” but he still argues-—in a legal forum!-—that this amendment to the California constitution that he admits was validly adopted is somehow unconstitutional? This guy must have done WAY too much drugs in the 60s and 70s.

If a script writer came up with this scenario, nobody would think his movie would be even remotely plausible.


39 posted on 02/04/2009 5:45:11 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Fred Thompson appears human-sized because he is actually standing a million miles away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AuH2ORepublican

““Brown told the court in a filing that he doesn’t think that Proposition 8 is a constitutional revision or that it violates the constitutional separate of powers. But he said he believes it is unconstitutional because it violates the inalienable right to liberty.”

So, Moonbeam is inviting...no, PLEADING for the judges to engage once again in judicial activism in order to overrule the will of the people.


41 posted on 02/04/2009 5:56:09 AM PST by ScottinVA (Make my world PURRRFECT, Lord Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: AuH2ORepublican

Well, there is a separate line of argument which suggests that this is unconstitutional under the 14th amendment of the US Constitution. I believe the overturn prop-8 supporters have been reluctant to champion this too much, because it will get reviewed by S.Ct., and there is no telling which way the court will swing. I’m guessing that’s the position Brown is taking here.


45 posted on 02/04/2009 6:57:28 AM PST by Conservativism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: AuH2ORepublican

Absurd challenge but it’s not the drugs, he just doesn’t care about the law.

He wants to be the champion of gay rights.


52 posted on 02/05/2009 5:23:44 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson