Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

We destroy our weapons while Iran builds theirs up.
1 posted on 02/03/2009 7:29:03 PM PST by CalifScreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: CalifScreaming

Why destroy , why doesn’t he just gift the nukes to Iran ? They have been working hard at it and I am sure A’jad would appreciate a friendly gesture.


26 posted on 02/03/2009 7:47:40 PM PST by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CalifScreaming

This will not work.

After smallpox was eliminated from the world as a contagious disease, the Russians initiated a huge program weaponizing smallpox. They even developed a warhead (1993) capable of keeping the virus refrigerated so it wouldn’t be destroyed by heat when the warhead reentered the atmosphere. Please note: we were at that time in 1993 sending billions to Russia, helping them rebuild their shattered economy - and they were making improvements to WMD weaponry!

They will double-cross us on any move to reduce nuclear weapons. The Russians, the Chinese, the Persians (Iran) cannot be trusted.


27 posted on 02/03/2009 7:47:56 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CalifScreaming
The radical treaty would cut the number of nuclear warheads to 1,000 each,...

Making every crack job potentate dream of being a nuclear super power.

29 posted on 02/03/2009 7:59:28 PM PST by SampleMan (Community Organizer: What liberals do when they run out of college, before they run out of Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CalifScreaming
We destroy our weapons while Iran builds theirs up.

And other Russian and Chinese allies like North Korea.

30 posted on 02/03/2009 7:59:41 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CalifScreaming

Ahhh...........why?

Doesn’t seem like us or the former Soviets are trying to blow up the world lately.

Perhaps he should focus on the parts of the world interesting in building more nukes (Iran, N. Korea, etc..)


31 posted on 02/03/2009 8:00:28 PM PST by GrouchoTex (...and ye shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you free....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CalifScreaming

California Screaming? (on such a Nuclear winter’s day...)


32 posted on 02/03/2009 8:01:25 PM PST by GrouchoTex (...and ye shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you free....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CalifScreaming
From "45 Communist Goals":
Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35
January 10, 1963:

1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

'Goals' 4-45 can be found here or at many other sites through a web search for "45 goals":
http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm
________________________________________________________

Obama Pledges Cuts in Missile Defense, Space, and Nuclear Weapons Programs

February 29, 2008 :: News
MissileThreat.com

A video has surfaced of Presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama talking on his plans for strategic issues such as nuclear weapons and missile defense.

The full text from the video, as released, reads as follows:

Thanks so much for the Caucus4Priorities, for the great work you've been doing. As president, I will end misguided defense policies and stand with Caucus4Priorities in fighting special interests in Washington.

First, I'll stop spending $9 billion a month in Iraq. I'm the only major candidate who opposed this war from the beginning. And as president I will end it.[i.e. not win it]

Second, I will cut tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending.

I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems.

I will not weaponize space.

I will slow our development of future combat systems.

And I will institute an independent "Defense Priorities Board" to ensure that the Quadrennial Defense Review is not used to justify unnecessary spending.

Third, I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons. To seek that goal, I will not develop new nuclear weapons; I will seek a global ban on the production of fissile material; and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBMs off hair-trigger alert, and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenals.

You know where I stand. I've fought for open, ethical and accountable government my entire public life. I don't switch positions or make promises that can't be kept. I don't posture on defense policy and I don't take money from federal lobbyists for powerful defense contractors. As president, my sole priority for defense spending will be protecting the American people. Thanks so much.

Article: Obama Pledges Cuts in Missile Defense, Space, and Nuclear Weapons Programs:
http://missilethreat.com/archives/id.7086/detail.asp

"MissileThreat.com is a project of The Claremont Institute devoted to understanding and promoting the requirements for the strategic defense of the United States."
________________________________________________________

New Pentagon Report: China's Growing Military Space Power
By Leonard David
Special Correspondent, SPACE.com
March 6, 2008

GOLDEN, Colorado — A just-released Pentagon report spotlights a growing U.S. military concern that China is developing a multi- dimensional program to limit or prevent the use of space-based assets by its potential adversaries during times of crisis or conflict.

Furthermore, last year's successful test by China of a direct-ascent, anti-satellite (ASAT) weapon to destroy its own defunct weather satellite, the report adds, underscores that country's expansion from the land, air, and sea dimensions of the traditional battlefield into the space and cyber-space domains.

Although China's commercial space program has utility for non- military research, that capability demonstrates space launch and control know-how that have direct military application. Even the Chang'e 1 — the Chinese lunar probe now circling the Moon — is flagged in the report as showcasing China's ability "to conduct complicated space maneuvers — a capability which has broad implications for military counterspace operations."

To read the entire publication [29.67MB/pdf], go to (U.S. Dept of Defense) :
http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/pdfs/China_Military_Report_08.pdf
________________________________________________________

From the Sino-Russian Joint Statement of April 23, 1997:
"The two sides [China and Russia] shall, in the spirit of partnership, strive to promote the multipolarization of the world and the establishment of a new international order."
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/HI29Ag01.html
________________________________________________________

Russia, China flex muscles in joint war games
Reuters: Aug 17, 2007

CHEBARKUL, Russia (Reuters) - Russia and China staged their biggest joint exercises on Friday but denied this show of military prowess could lead to the formation of a counterweight to NATO.

"Today's exercises are another step towards strengthening the relations between our countries, a step towards strengthening international peace and security, and first and foremost, the security of our peoples," Putin said.

Fighter jets swooped overhead, commandos jumped from helicopters on to rooftops and the boom of artillery shells shook the firing range in Russia's Ural mountains as two of the largest armies in the world were put through their paces.

The exercises take place against a backdrop of mounting rivalry between the West, and Russia and China for influence over Central Asia, a strategic region that has huge oil, gas and mineral resources.

Russia's growing assertiveness is also causing jitters in the West. Putin announced at the firing range that Russia was resuming Soviet-era sorties by its strategic bomber aircraft near NATO airspace.
http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-29030120070817?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=0
________________________________________________________

Obama and the case of the missing 'thesis'
July 24, 2008
By Jim Popkin, NBC News Senior Investigative Producer

excerpt:

The hunt for Obama’s senior “thesis” began with a throwaway line in a newspaper article last October. The New York Times story, on Obama’s early New York years, mentioned in passing that the presidential contender had majored in political science at Columbia and had spent his time “writing his thesis on Soviet nuclear disarmament.”

Journalists began hounding Columbia University for copies of the musty document. Conservative bloggers began wondering if the young Obama had written a no-nukes screed that he might come to regret. And David Bossie, the former congressional investigator and “right-wing hit man,” as one newspaper described him, took out classified newspaper ads in Columbia University’s newspaper and the Chicago Tribune in March searching for the term paper.

Bossie came up dry, but said the effort was well worth it:

“A thesis entitled Soviet Nuclear Disarmament, written at the height of The Cold War in 1983, might shed some light upon what Barack Obama thought about our most pressing foreign policy issue for 40-plus years (U.S.-Soviet Relations),” he wrote in an e-mail to NBC News.

http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/07/24/1219454.aspx
________________________________________________________

Here is the passage from the New York Times that the above article refers to:

"He barely mentions Columbia, training ground for the elite, where he transferred in his junior year, majoring in political science and international relations and writing his thesis on Soviet nuclear disarmament. He dismisses in one sentence his first community organizing job — work he went on to do in Chicago — though a former supervisor remembers him as 'a star performer.'"

Obama’s Account of New York Years Often Differs From What Others Say
By JANNY SCOTT, October 30, 2007:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/30/us/politics/30obama.html?ex=1351396800&en=631bf83f428647f9&ei=5089&partner=rssyahoo&emc=rss

33 posted on 02/03/2009 8:03:39 PM PST by ETL (Smoking gun evidence on ALL the ObamaRat-commie connections at my newly revised FR Home/About page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CalifScreaming

The spirit of Nunn - Lugar now occupies the Oval Office.

Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgggggghhhh!

(That’s my California scream ....) :-)


38 posted on 02/03/2009 8:19:47 PM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CalifScreaming
"President Obama seeks Russia deal to slash nuclear weapons.

WOW, How ingenious!! What a guy!!!!

I am surprised nobody ever thought of this before!!!

Oh, wait.

39 posted on 02/03/2009 8:20:14 PM PST by R_Kangel (`.`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CalifScreaming

SALT III treaty?

Lovely.

Jimmah Cahtah part deux.


40 posted on 02/03/2009 8:23:31 PM PST by mamelukesabre (Give me Liberty or give me something to aim at)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CalifScreaming

Obama will be committing national suicide.


48 posted on 02/04/2009 12:05:46 PM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Admin Moderator

Breaking News please.

This is more important than Obama raising taxes this is national suicide.


49 posted on 02/04/2009 12:11:40 PM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CalifScreaming
Of course. Obama is a communist. He wants Americans disarmed as individuals and he wants America disarmed as a nation. He wants us to be helpless and defenseless.
52 posted on 02/04/2009 12:34:59 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CalifScreaming
Russia replies, "sure, good idea"


53 posted on 02/04/2009 12:43:15 PM PST by Indy Pendance (Limbaugh/Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CalifScreaming

Barry’s an expert doncha know. He wrote a term paper for a loony college professor circa 1982.


54 posted on 02/04/2009 12:48:42 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CalifScreaming
Sheesh! This moron really is stuck in the 1960s! The Russians are NOT the problem, Obama.
55 posted on 02/04/2009 12:56:37 PM PST by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CalifScreaming

Everyone needs to call their US Senators today and explain the unemployment thing to them. This crap must stop or we will be the new Argentina!


56 posted on 02/04/2009 12:57:51 PM PST by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CalifScreaming
I envision Reagan crying from heaven at what this fool is doing to our country.


59 posted on 02/04/2009 1:00:46 PM PST by TSgt (Extreme vitriol and rancorous replies served daily. - Mike W USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CalifScreaming
Whitehouse.gov

Review Weapons Programs: We must rebalance our capabilities to ensure that our forces can succeed in both conventional wars and in stabilization and counter-insurgency operations. Obama and Biden have committed to a review of each major defense program in light of current needs, gaps in the field, and likely future threat scenarios in the post-9/11 world.

60 posted on 02/04/2009 1:00:57 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CalifScreaming

This clown can’t even produce a selective service number.


61 posted on 02/04/2009 1:03:26 PM PST by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson