from these different scams that you have done we can all see that haloing and the various fringes are not natural results of scanning a document into an electronic form, nor are they the result of laser printing because if they were then they would show up on all these images, and since debris on a scanner screen would not create halos around lettering throughout the document, we can only follow the advice of the master detective himself.....
“When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.” Sherlock Holmes, The Blanched Soldier
Just as I asked BrerLion for a little guidance, can you help those of us with no background in this type of analysis with what these images represent?
I can see that #2 seems more yellow than #1, that to what appears a lesser extent, the same for #4 than #3, and also for #6 than #5. #4 is also a sharper image.
I have no idea what that means in terms of implication, can you help?
Well...let's compare apples to oranges. It would help to point out the difference in resolution between the images that you claim are scans (I believe you and that they are scans) and the published Zero image (still being debated). Of course the published image looks crappy compared to the the images in your post! (That's post 307, above.)
Questions:
(1) Is this "problem" of green/halo in the "scan" really even an issue? (or is it more likely a black hole that should have been avoided from the start?)
(2) If it is, isn't it the LEAST important COLB authenticity issue?
No one can prove that the image hasn't been manipulated. It just isn't logically possible.
The corolary: Anyone can claim an image has been manipulated, and be relatively safe from disproof.