To: mylife
Therefore, temperature is not a function of CO2, The inverse is true. May be. CO2 levels seem to rise as temperatures rise, and fall when they drop. Notice there are drastic differences in temperature for the same CO2 levels.
6 posted on
02/02/2009 9:43:10 PM PST by
Doe Eyes
To: Doe Eyes
Perhaps the largest CO2 sinks on the planet, “the oceans” do not respond to absorption and release of CO2 in a linear rate
7 posted on
02/02/2009 9:46:36 PM PST by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: Doe Eyes
"Phlbtttt! Eggheads? Who needs 'em?"
8 posted on
02/02/2009 9:49:15 PM PST by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: Doe Eyes
You ever notice a soda loses its fizz quickly as it warms?
I bet it’s ability to absorb CO2 as it cools is at a lesser rate.
I propose a federal grant, that I may research this phenomena!
9 posted on
02/02/2009 9:55:52 PM PST by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: Doe Eyes
Hysteresis is not uncommon in nature, but don’t make a common error—forgetting that what was measured was a proxy variable. Temperature wasn’t measured directly, so other variables come into play...such as ice coverage, etc. And these are only the beginnings of considerations.
20 posted on
02/03/2009 12:05:23 AM PST by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: Doe Eyes
The biggest sink of CO2 is the ocean.
Cold water holds more CO2 than warm water, as anybody can observe with a warm can of Coke versus a cold can. As the oceans get warmer, they release more CO2. I'm going to guess there is far more CO2 in the oceans than in the atmosphere.
34 posted on
02/04/2009 6:43:47 AM PST by
PapaBear3625
(We used to institutionalize the insane. Now we elect them.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson