Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UCFRoadWarrior

Away from moral issues and more toward economic/freedom issues. maybe we’ll finally win an election. Its not always about abortion guys.


48 posted on 02/02/2009 9:33:49 AM PST by Troll_House_Cookies (Ironically, Chancellor Obama's first re-education camp will be in Alaska.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Troll_House_Cookies
Away from moral issues and more toward economic/freedom issues. maybe we’ll finally win an election. Its not always about abortion guys.

So, the next GOP presidential nominee should pledge to appoint activist judges who'll uphold Rowe vs. Wade and gay rights?

You want new emphasis to appeal to non-Republican voters in blue states, an emphasis that would alienate present Republican voters in red states that actually vote for GOP presidential candidates.

Great strategy.

113 posted on 02/02/2009 9:58:43 AM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: Troll_House_Cookies
Away from moral issues and more toward economic/freedom issues. maybe we’ll finally win an election. Its not always about abortion guys.

There are two elements in the abortion issue, and the "gay" marriage issue is the same. They are rooted in the morality of the issue. Abortion is baby killing.

The first element is the issue itself, which is always an issue, even if the courts have preempted it.

The second is the qualification, integrity, and personal character of the candidate as a candidate on other issues such as economic/ freedom issues. A baby-killing pervert, which is what pro-choice liberals are, is unsound on any issue as a candidate. They declare themselves amoral and it produces people who think they are above any moral standard or law, as is being illustrated by the tax cheats Obama is appointing.

Such candidates think there is no higher standard than themselves, not divine, not morality, not the constitution, not the public good. That is why they are always unacceptable. When it comes to economic and freedom issues, someone who sees nothing wrong with the torture killing of babies is driven only by self serving, and self interest, since that is the only basis for this infanticide.

121 posted on 02/02/2009 10:07:30 AM PST by verklaring (Pyrite is not gold))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: Troll_House_Cookies

Exactly. The noisy crowd who would eagerly toss economic and personal freedom out the window, in order to make abortion and gay marriage illegal, are dangerous.


162 posted on 02/02/2009 10:28:56 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: Troll_House_Cookies

Thank you

That is the exact point. We don’t need litmus tests on social issues to push forward the conservative agenda

Small government. Lower taxes. Strong national defense

Why can’t a gay person who supports that be reached out to?


163 posted on 02/02/2009 10:30:00 AM PST by MadIsh32 (The token Muslim :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: Troll_House_Cookies

no it’s about traditional marriage and if one wants to accept a disgusting sexual agenda

some might be alright with a man inserting his penis into another mans arse but I am not.

It is not even natural FHS

Think about it , sick

the Dems are the party of perverts and the mentally sexually sick


360 posted on 02/02/2009 12:22:50 PM PST by manc (Marriage is between a man and a woman no sick MA,CT sham marriage end racism end affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson