Posted on 02/02/2009 4:26:29 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
Boeing considers restarting OV-10 production after 23-year hiatus
By Stephen Trimble
Boeing is considering the possibility of restarting production of the OV-10 Bronco turboprop, a Vietnam-era light attack and observation aircraft last produced in 1976.
The company confirms that the OV-10 could be offered as either a light attack or intra-theatre light cargo aircraft for the US Air Force. The international market is also driving interest in the slow-flying aircraft, which blends some of the observational capabilities of a helicopter with the range of a fixed-wing aircraft.
Boeing has cited recent USAF interest in acquiring a light attack aircraft as a possible reason to revive OV-10 production.
Although known for its surveillance prowess, the OV-10 remains in combat service in four countries: Colombia (pictured below), Indonesia, the Philippines and Venezuela, with a weapons load at least equivalent to the Bell AH-1 Cobra attack helicopter. Some of those countries, and perhaps new customers, could seek remanufactured or new production OV-10s as their current fleets wear out.
So far, the USAF has not decided whether to buy a light attack fleet, known as the OA-X. But the Air National Guard will experiment later this year with the Beechcraft AT-6 Texan II. The USAF is also buying dozens of AT-6s on behalf of the Iraqi air force. The Embraer EMB-314 Super Tucano and US Aircraft A-67 Dragon are also candidates for an OA-X order.
If the OA-X opportunity stalls, Boeing believes there could be interest in reviving the OV-10 as an intra-theatre transport for moving small groups of troops or medical services around the battlefield.
Boeing notes that the OV-10 revival idea is very preliminary. However, the company has created a marketing brochure, which has been circulated at defence industry events.
Unmanned air systems are being increasingly augmented by piloted aircraft for the persistent intelligence surveillance reconnaissance mission. The US Army and US Marine Corps have adapted the Shorts C-23B Sherpa with a wide-area surveillance sensor, and the USAF will deploy 37 MC-12W Project Liberty aircraft - modified Beechcraft King Air 350/350ERs, to augment unmanned operations.
The OV-10 has been considered for a similar role for several years. The Department of Defense contacted John Hodgson, president of the OV-10 Bronco Association, a few years ago to inquire about fleet availability.
Hodgson is not surprised by the rising interest in the observation platform. "It doesn't make any difference how good your UAV is," he says. "Nothing replaces a couple of eyeballs on a head that moves around."
A great aircraft. Used to service them at NAS Alameda back in 68’.
I'd rather see them bring back the A-10 project, at least it can get out of its own way...
23 years ago would have been 1986, not 1976.
Who proof reads this stuff?
1976 was 33 years ago, not 23.
I’m guessing the reason is the low cost per hour flown compared to jet aircraft.
Ooh, poor choice of words there.
They were a death trap in Vietnam and probably still are. No front-seater ever survived a crash landing or water ditching.
I wonder if this has anything to do with Boeing knowing full and well that Obama plans to gut the US military like Clinton did. I fully expect many current defense projects to be cancelled.
“They were a death trap in Vietnam and probably still are.”
No, actually the OV-10 had a pretty good safety record. Why would the two crewmen stay in a crippled OV-10? They had pretty good ejection seats. I can personally attest to their effectiveness.
TC
“....23 years ago would have been 1986, not 1976.
Who proof reads this stuff?....”
Dr. James Hansen of NASA, of course.
Captain Steven L. Bennett
On June 29, 1972, Captain Bennett, a forward air controller, was flying an OV-10 Bronco on an artillery adjustment mission near Quang Tri City, South Vietnam. A Marine gunfire spotter occupied the rear seat of the lightly armed reconnaissance aircraft.
After controlling gunfire from U.S. naval vessels off shore and directing air strikes against enemy positions for approximately three hours, Captain Bennett received an urgent call for assistance. A small South Vietnamese unit was about to be attacked by a much larger enemy force. Without immediate help, the unit was certain to be overrun. Unfortunately, there were no friendly fighters left in the area, and supporting naval gunfire would have endangered the South Vietnamese. They were between the coast and the enemy.
Captain Bennett decided to strafe the advancing soldiers. Since they were North Vietnamese regulars, equipped with heat-seeking SAM 7 missiles, the risks in making a low-level attack were great. Captain Bennett nonetheless zoomed down and opened fire with his four small machine guns. The troops scattered and began to fall back under repeated strafing.
As the twin-boomed Bronco pulled up from its fifth attack, a missile rose up from behind and struck the plane's left engine. The explosion set the engine on fire and knocked the left landing gear from its stowed position, leaving it hanging down. The canopies over the two airmen were pierced by fragments.
Captain Bennett veered southward to find a field for an emergency landing. As the fire in the engine continued to spread, he was urged by the pilot of an escorting OV-10 to eject. The wing was in danger of exploding. He then learned that his observer's parachute had been shredded by fragments in the explosion.
Captain Bennett elected to ditch in the Gulf of Tonkin, although he knew that his cockpit area would very likely break up on impact. No pilot had ever survived an OV-10 ditching. As he touched down, the extended landing gear dug into the water. The Bronco spun to the left and flipped over nose down into the sea. His Marine companion managed to escape, but Captain Bennett, trapped in his smashed cockpit, sank with the plane. His body was recovered the next day.
For sacrificing his life, Captain Bennett was posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor. The decoration was presented to his widow by Vice President Gerald R. Ford Aug. 8, 1974.
Why would the DOD allow it in an MOH citation if it wasn't true?
It’s great to hear from a man who actually knows the subject under discussion.
We used to enjoy watching OV-10’s doing acro on slow days while loitering, looking for targets. Great bird!
Thanks for all of the (really) close air support you Scooter drivers gave us Grunts. We had an A-4 working for us against the NVA on a hill in Arizona Territory in early 1969. He was so low that if I had known the pilot, I could have recognized him! Now that’s “close air support”! After we took that hill, I spent the night sleeping in one of the Zuni craters he left.
Semper Fi from an old 81’s FO, field radio operator, tunnel rat and (years later) CH-53 driver.
Keep the faith in your current combat position ;-)
The titanium bathtub in the A-10 makes it pricey.
besides, I’d MUCH rather keep the Warthog to ourselves, if we can. I worked on the A-10 LASTE program.
0 is going to need these for use by his Civilian Defense Force to keep us all in line (for bread and soup most likely).
demonstrate its flight capabilities. Impressive aircraft!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.