Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gordon Greene; elkfersupper

You’re right, Gordon Greene. I should use qualifiers (some, a few, etc.) where necessary. I should have restricted the mention to a few of the less scrupulous and politically pushy investment bankers, merchants and importers instead of generalizing, “the bankers and their free traitors.” Please accept my apology.


42 posted on 02/01/2009 7:13:24 PM PST by familyop (combat engineer (combat), National Guard, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: familyop; elkfersupper; All

I would like for someone to explain to me where I’m missing something here; here’s what I see in this post...

The subject of the story is not the lenders, but the car dealers who did not fulfill their contract obligations and paid off the cars (and have probably not filed the necessary paper work either). The banks have been stuck for the last few years with debt obligations that were not their own because the government strong-armed them into making loans to unqualified recipients. I have been one of those unqualified recipients in the past through bad choices, and I paid back everything because it was my obligation to do so. But I took out the loan so I was responsible.

Seems since the government has gotten on the bandwagon of blaming the banks for the credit crisis, it’s gotten to be the popular thing to do so for the rest of the country, politics completely aside. I do agree the banks should be taking the morons to the cleaners who are causing the issue... the car dealers. But they are probably just looking at paper that tells them who last held the loan. That would lead them to go after the last known owner of the vehicle. If the car dealer was going out of business in the first place chances are paperwork was less important to them than cash in hand.

If the banks have no other recourse, should I suppose they should just go down with the car dealers? I certainly don’t want them coming after me, but like someone pointed out in an earlier post, if the person trading in the car has a contract and have read it then they would know their legal rights in the situation and whether they are signing to be liable in event of the car dealers default. If not, they will show the contract and make an appeal to the bank to cease and desist.

Tell me where I’m misunderstanding...


47 posted on 02/01/2009 7:36:14 PM PST by Gordon Greene (www.fracturedrepublic.com - Welcome to the brave new world...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson