Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: raccoonradio
COUPLES who have more than two children are being “irresponsible” by creating an unbearable burden on the environment

Actually a growing number of childless couples or couples without more than two children are creating the burden. Since a certain number of children are required to replace the population, if the children are being raised in a large family, there is actually less spent per child because more live a single home. Economy of scale. The requirement should be that all childless couples or single people who are so because they are "green" should be required to share expenses in a group home consisting of no less than 6 people so that valuable resources don't get used up making so many houses for childless couples.
44 posted on 02/01/2009 5:07:07 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: aruanan

“The requirement should be that all childless couples or single people who are so because they are “green” should be required to share expenses in a group home consisting of no less than 6 people so that valuable resources don’t get used up making so many houses for childless couples.”

Why have I never thought of this? I’m glad you included the “because they are green” comment. I know there are plenty of couples that would love to have children but can’t seem to make it happen.


71 posted on 02/02/2009 8:19:52 PM PST by samiam1972 ("It is a poverty to decide that a child must die so that you may live as you wish."-Mother Teresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson