Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq's ‘Eye in the Sky’ Safeguards Voters
Multi-National Force - Iraq ^

Posted on 01/31/2009 9:08:08 AM PST by SandRat

BAGHDAD — Flying high above Baghdad, the Iraqi Air Force demonstrated its capability to view polling stations and other potential critical-incident locations in preparation for the upcoming Provincial Elections.

This “eye in the sky” is a sensor system, similar to that of a U.S. Predator UAV, down-linked for display into the Iraqi Prime Minister’s National Operations Center.

The demonstration of this capability was conducted for the Iraqi National Security Advisor, Dr. Mowaffak al-Rubaie, other senior Government of Iraqi officials, and Coalition military advisors, Jan. 28.

The demonstration was designed to showcase the functional capability of the Iraqi Air Force’s King Air 350 Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance aircraft to provide real-time surveillance and full-motion video to support decision-making in the PM-NOC.

The King Air 350 is new to the Iraqi Air Force. It represents a substantial leap forward in Iraq’s ability to provide aerial surveillance to support civil and military operations across the country.

The twin-engine turboprop aircraft boasts a crew of three, including a dedicated sensor operator, over six hours’ endurance, and a radius in excess of 1,000 nautical miles. The Iraqi Air Force’s five King Air 350 ISR aircraft operate from the 87th Squadron, headquartered at New Muthana airbase in Baghdad.

There are also four fixed ground stations, or downlink sites, located throughout Iraq, and five mobile ground receivers in the Iraqi Air Force. These mobile ground receivers provided the link into the PM-NOC during Wednesday’s event. The demonstration highlighted the aircraft’s ability to display full-motion video through the airplane’s 360-degree electro-optical sensor to the mobile ground receiver.

In addition to the video capability, the system also provides an infrared sensor, synthetic aperture radar imaging capability, and Ground Moving Target Indicator capabilities to detect moving vehicles. With this capability, Iraq’s top national security leadership and other decision makers now have a system to provide real-time, accurate information, to help make better decisions when responding to crisis events, or conducting military and civil operations.

U.S. Navy Cmdr. Chuck Pratt, an intelligence advisor with Multi-National Security Transition Command – Iraq’s Intelligence Transition Team, commented on the advanced capabilities of the King Air 350.

“We envision the Iraqi Air Force using this system to support Military or Police Operations Centers, or, for example, with the Iraqi Navy, supporting maritime security operations and oil platform defense in the northern Arabian Gulf,” he said. “We also need to network the ground stations so information can be viewed where it is needed.”

MNSTC-I’s efforts in this operation help to highlight the commitment between the governments of the United States and Iraq in improving the capabilities of the Iraqi Security Forces during the critical transition from Coalition to Iraqi-led operations in support of a secure and stable Iraq.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: frwn; iraq; iraqiairforce; iraqielection; safeguards; uav; voters

1 posted on 01/31/2009 9:08:08 AM PST by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 91B; HiJinx; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; freekitty; A Navy Vet; ...
FR WAR NEWS!
If you would like to be added to / removed from FRWN,
please FReepmail Sandrat.

WARNING: FRWN can be an EXTREMELY HIGH-VOLUME PING LIST!!

2 posted on 01/31/2009 9:08:27 AM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Great to see this new democracy up and functioning using such technology. But I am a little nervous. Didn’t we help the Shah of Iran? Didn’t we help Osama Bin Laden vs the Ruskies, training and arming them?


3 posted on 01/31/2009 9:12:10 AM PST by DBCJR (What would you expect?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Good work. Were it only so at the polling places of America. This election was hijacked by cheating, Democrat poll officers, Democrat Secretaries of State, and ACORN.

Fair elections are a thing of the past in America. They are now only perfunctory operations predestined for one (The One) outcome.

4 posted on 01/31/2009 9:12:37 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR
Didn’t we help Osama Bin Laden vs the Ruskies, training and arming them?

Please, please expand your sources of information beyond CNN and 60 Minutes.

5 posted on 01/31/2009 9:16:55 AM PST by denydenydeny (People in dictatorships long for truth while pampered, decadent people in the West long for myth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR
Great to see this new democracy up and functioning using such technology. But I am a little nervous. ... Didn’t we help Osama Bin Laden vs the Ruskies, training and arming them?

No. Liberal myth playing upon Americans' guilt complexes. CIA funded native mujahideen. ISI might've redirected some CIA money to the Arab muj, but it's far more likely that most of the Arabs simply paid their own way. Osama is independently wealthy, after all, and Saudi Arabia was just as involved in the covert Afghan war as anyone else.

As for this aircraft, what possible threat could it represent to the US or US interests? It's a low-speed, low-altitude, fairly low-loiter reconnaissance aircraft with no armament or stealth capabilities. I have no doubt it's really good at what it does, but it doesn't do anything to be nervous about.

6 posted on 01/31/2009 9:30:36 AM PST by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny
Please, please expand your sources of information beyond CNN and 60 Minutes.

On that note, I recommend Steve Coll's Ghost Wars. A bit dry, but very honest. You'd think Coll's MSM credentials would have popularized the book more than it was, but it just didn't support the liberal narrative of Afghanistan.

7 posted on 01/31/2009 9:34:05 AM PST by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

I like the “Eye in the Sky” part. Just what we need here.</sarc>


8 posted on 01/31/2009 10:05:40 AM PST by Minutemen ("It's a Religion of Peace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caesar Soze

Are you saying that the US did NOT:

1) train bin Laden’s forces

2) provide arms (sold or given)?


9 posted on 01/31/2009 10:12:32 AM PST by DBCJR (What would you expect?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny

Your assumptions are wrong and condescending. If you know so much, enlighten us with facts and references. I asked a question.


10 posted on 01/31/2009 10:15:27 AM PST by DBCJR (What would you expect?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR

No worries as democracies don’t war on each other.


11 posted on 01/31/2009 11:53:02 AM PST by Blue State Insurgent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR

What arms did we provide Bin Laden with?


12 posted on 01/31/2009 12:02:16 PM PST by Blue State Insurgent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Blue State Insurgent

According to an AP article in the Washington Post, “U.S. Sent Guns to Bin Laden in 1980s,” Washington Post, 10/16/01, we provided guns.


13 posted on 01/31/2009 3:18:46 PM PST by DBCJR (What would you expect?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR
Curious timing for that story from the leftist Washington Compost, don't you think?
14 posted on 01/31/2009 4:12:30 PM PST by Blue State Insurgent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Blue State Insurgent

Yes, the timing was counter patriotic but I suspect the headline at least somewhat factual.


15 posted on 01/31/2009 6:20:57 PM PST by DBCJR (What would you expect?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR

Really? I suspect the headline is a stinking lie.


16 posted on 01/31/2009 6:42:59 PM PST by Blue State Insurgent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Blue State Insurgent

Yes, at the time bin Laden was fighting the Russians


17 posted on 01/31/2009 8:03:33 PM PST by DBCJR (What would you expect?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson