I’ve now clearly stated my position and your problem in post 510. I always thought you an ally on the pro-life cause but in my opinion you unwittingly hurt the cause through your own self-delusion.
Catholics have a saying: “whole life, pro life.” You need to look at the whole man - but you don’t want to, for some reason known only to you insist on clinging to 25 seconds of some 2-1/2 year old debate segment for reasons known only to you where in the same debate he is hammering for the cause of life in embryonic stem cell research, ironically, being the first and only known politician in history to do so (I’d say like a Nazi declaring he’s a Semite, too).
With all the reasons I’ve provided looking at the whole man I suppose somehow you could find a way to say the Pope wasn’t pro-life either. Somehow...
I think that if Mr. Steele fails to repudiate his former remarks, brightly, clearly, directly, it is his supporters who will be damaging the cause of life.
I just can't wait (barf) to see the commercials by the Party of Satan saying, “Democratic Rep. So-and-So really IS pro-life, even if he accepts that Roe should stand. After all, that's the position of the CHAIRMAN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!”
There are about a million variations on that theme.
I see this all around me in Maryland, where my Party of Satan friends tell me that they really are pro-life even if they vote for the POS filth, that one doesn't have to hold that Roe should go to be pro-life.
Letting Mr. Steele be chairman of the party WITHOUT requiring him to repudiate his former remarks cripples the pro-life movement.
sitetest