I'll take the on-the-record televised actual words of the man over a summary of a private conversation reported by a third party.
If Mr. Steele wants to be taken seriously again as a pro-lifer, he needs to be loud and proud about the fact that Roe must go.
sitetest
I’ve now clearly stated my position and your problem in post 510. I always thought you an ally on the pro-life cause but in my opinion you unwittingly hurt the cause through your own self-delusion.
Catholics have a saying: “whole life, pro life.” You need to look at the whole man - but you don’t want to, for some reason known only to you insist on clinging to 25 seconds of some 2-1/2 year old debate segment for reasons known only to you where in the same debate he is hammering for the cause of life in embryonic stem cell research, ironically, being the first and only known politician in history to do so (I’d say like a Nazi declaring he’s a Semite, too).
With all the reasons I’ve provided looking at the whole man I suppose somehow you could find a way to say the Pope wasn’t pro-life either. Somehow...