Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I will stand with Steele.
1 posted on 01/30/2009 1:07:19 PM PST by utahson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
To: utahson

As a Reagan - Palin Republican, glad to see Michael Steele
as leader of RNC

He is a Catholic, he gets it, from a border type state.
He doesn’t turn off the south or the north.
He is a true African American who has a history in the U.S.


31 posted on 01/30/2009 1:14:23 PM PST by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin - Jindal 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: utahson

Election, not appointment. But congratulations are still in order.


32 posted on 01/30/2009 1:14:32 PM PST by Buck W. (BHO: Selling hope, keeping the change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: utahson

I couldn’t be me thrilled about this.

I see hope in this party now.


34 posted on 01/30/2009 1:14:42 PM PST by Granny Rudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: utahson

Is Steele the new RNC Chairman? I can’t find anything on it.


41 posted on 01/30/2009 1:16:03 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: utahson

Nice short acceptance speech by Steele. He will not cede any area of our country and will work to rebuild the Republican party.


43 posted on 01/30/2009 1:16:18 PM PST by proud2beconservativeinNJ ("In God We Trust")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: utahson; fatima; meandog; PhiKapMom; GOP_Lady; Clintonfatigued; Impy
WOO-HOOOOO!!!
44 posted on 01/30/2009 1:16:20 PM PST by Norman Bates (Steele for RNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: utahson

Michael Steele is IFFY on 2nd amendment/GUN rights...

“Michael Steele:

Q: Should people have access to buy assault weapons or any gun that they want?

Michael Steele: Well, I mean you draw the line. I mean, what do you need an assault weapon for? I mean, if going hunting, I think that’s a little overkill or whatever, but the reality of it is, I think it’s important for a society, a community to draw the lines as we’ve drawn in a number of other constitutional areas, but I don’t think that that means that you go to a total ban for those who want to use guns for skeet shooting and hobbying and hunting and things like that.


48 posted on 01/30/2009 1:16:39 PM PST by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VanillaBlizzard
We were just talking about this at lunch.

Steele is better than Duncan, but still bears watching.

Q: Your views on gun control?
A: My views are pretty much in line with the governor's. I grew up under some of the strictest gun control laws in the country. You can have all the gun control laws in the country, but if you don't enforce them, people are going to find a way to protect themselves. We need to recognize that bad people are doing bad things with these weapons. It's not the law-abiding citizens, it's not the person who uses it as a hobby.
Q: Should people have access to buy assault weapons?
A: Society should draw lines. What do you need an assault weapon for, if you're going hunting? That's overkill. But I don't think that means you go to a total ban for those who want to use gun for skeet shooting or hunting or things like that But what's the point of passing gun laws if we're not going to enforce them? If you want to talk about gun control, that's where you need to start. We've got 300 gun laws on the books right now. At the end of the day, it's about how we enforce the law.
Source: Washington Post interview Oct 16, 2006

CLOSE watching.

49 posted on 01/30/2009 1:16:44 PM PST by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: utahson

I am THRILLED! Yes - it’s official . . . just felt a tingle run up my leg. Steele has been my choice all along, and I know he’ll provide strong conservative leadership for the Republican party.


51 posted on 01/30/2009 1:16:53 PM PST by caper gal 1 (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: utahson

Any guesses on how the DUmmies are going to react?


52 posted on 01/30/2009 1:17:02 PM PST by America2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: utahson

http://www.creativeminorityreport.com

Matthew Archbold:

Is Michael Steele pro-life? I fear the answer might be no.

I’ve long liked and respected Lt. Gov. Michael Steele and considered him a great candidate to Chair the RNC. I’ve seen many pro-life bloggers even endorse him but yesterday a commenter named Darcy pointed me to Steele’s appearance on Meet The Press on October 29, 2006. The transcript is here.

According to his own statements, Steele is against overturning Roe V. Wade. He is also against a Constitutional Amendment banning abortion. He also rather disingenuously calls abortion an issue that should be handled by the states even though the states can’t really restrict abortion in any meaningful way until Roe is overturned.

And for many in the pro-life movement, Steele’s comments could disqualify him from receiving their support. Here’s the disturbing transcript:

MR. RUSSERT: ...Mr. Steele, if you’re United States Senator, would you vote for a constitutional amendment to outlaw abortion?

LT. GOV. STEELE: I don’t — vote for a constitutional amendment to outlaw abortion? I think we’d have to have that get to the Supreme Court, wouldn’t we? I haven’t seen that bill proposed. I don’t think...

MR. RUSSERT: That’s been introduced in the Senate.

LT. GOV. STEELE: I don’t think anyone’s going to propose that this day.

MR. RUSSERT: So you wouldn’t do that?

LT. GOV. STEELE: No.

MR. RUSSERT: Would, would you encourage — would you hope the U.S. Supreme Court overturns Roe vs. Wade?

LT. GOV. STEELE: I think that that’s a matter that’s going to rightly belong to the courts to decide ultimately whether or not that, that issue should be addressed. The, the Court has taken a position, which I agree, stare decisis, which means that the law is as it is and, and so this is a matter that’s ultimately going to be adjudicated at the states. We’re seeing that. The states are beginning to decide for themselves on, on this and a host of other issues. And the Supreme Court would ultimately decide that.

MR. RUSSERT: But you hope that the Court keeps Roe v. Wade in place?

LT. GOV. STEELE: I think the Court will evaluate the law as society progresses, as the Court is supposed to do.

MR. RUSSERT: But what’s your position? Do you want them to sustain it or overturn it?

LT. GOV. STEELE: Well, I think, I think, I think Roe vs. Wade, Roe vs. Wade is a, is a matter that should’ve been left to the states to decide, ultimately. But it, it is where it is today, and the courts will ultimately decide whether or not this, this gets addressed by the states, goes back to the states in some form or they overturn it outright.

MR. RUSSERT: Is is your desire to keep it in place?

LT. GOV. STEELE: My desire is that we follow what stare decisis is at this point, yes.

I am very very sorry to read this. If Steele is unwilling to stand up for the unborn because he feared it might damage his campaign I doubt he’ll stand up for the unborn when he steers an entire party. For me, fiscal conservatism is not enough.

Fiscal conservatives speak all the time about shuttling the rabid pro-lifers away. Electing Michael Steele as head of the RNC might be one giant step in that direction.


54 posted on 01/30/2009 1:17:14 PM PST by EternalVigilance (God is watching and listening.)(The Personhood Imperative: www.BanAbortionNOW.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: utahson

Congratulations, Mr. Steele!


55 posted on 01/30/2009 1:17:19 PM PST by fetal heart beats by 21st day (If you defend baby-killing in this life, you will have no defense in the after-life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: utahson

Huzzah!


56 posted on 01/30/2009 1:17:41 PM PST by keepitreal (Obama brings change: an international crisis (terrorism) within 6 months)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: utahson

Hopefully the rest of the RNC beltway crew isn’t lining up to give Steele a Spinectomy.

If Steele withers and turns into a “bi-partisan reach across the aisle hands across the table” gutless Democrat Lite, then the RNC and Republican party are toast ...


61 posted on 01/30/2009 1:18:12 PM PST by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: utahson

I am from MD too. I hope he is not a RINO. MD is very liberal. Some of his comments about reaching out were scary, and he jumped on Rush over “Puff, the magic XX”


66 posted on 01/30/2009 1:19:23 PM PST by sickoflibs (Pelosi: " We will create jobs by teaching kids to use condoms in recovery bill")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: utahson

Good, Steele is a good conservative. Plus he has a great charisma on tv and can communicate well. The GOP needs a new public face that can connect with people.

And, yes its a plus that he can be critical of Obama without having to worry about being called racist.


70 posted on 01/30/2009 1:19:55 PM PST by jbwbubba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: utahson

An Excellent choice-—Michael Steele!!!!!!!!!!!!


72 posted on 01/30/2009 1:20:05 PM PST by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: utahson

WOOOOHOOOOO!!!
Very good news....we needed it this week. ;)


74 posted on 01/30/2009 1:20:28 PM PST by AirForceMom (Locked and loaded, and sharpening my pitchfork.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: utahson

The Stupid Party no more!!!!


78 posted on 01/30/2009 1:21:22 PM PST by Dems_R_Losers (Still not drinking the Obama Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: utahson

Wonderful! I’m glad for him.


82 posted on 01/30/2009 1:21:44 PM PST by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson