Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Suggested FDR’s ‘New Deal’ Was Too Small, House Republicans Say
CNS News ^ | 1/29/2009 | Josiah Ryan

Posted on 01/29/2009 4:56:18 AM PST by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: wolfcreek

“Then World War II came along and was the biggest stimulus plan ever.”

It was the war production that put people back to work and made the New Deal (which was an abject failure, as BO and his people must know) APPEAR to work.


41 posted on 01/29/2009 6:20:58 AM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
And so, America’s economic downfall began. (Intersting concept).

"Interesting" is a word that I use when I'm trying ot be polite but want to say "completely $((@!(@* insane".

Although we produced a lot of armaments for WW II, there were so many restrictions on what people could buy you could argue that the consumer was still in the Depression through 1945. What got us out was the removal of rationing which freed pent up consumer demand, the removal of many of Roosevelt's counterproductive economic rules after the war and the fact that most of the factories in the world other than America's were in smoking ruins.

42 posted on 01/29/2009 6:24:34 AM PST by KarlInOhio (On 9/11 Israel mourned with us while the Palestinians danced in the streets. Who should we support?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

ping for later.


43 posted on 01/29/2009 6:54:55 AM PST by Marmolade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
At this rate hope and spare change will be all that's left for our children, and they can forget about the hope part.
44 posted on 01/29/2009 7:07:06 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

That’s funny. I’ve been arguing with libs for an entire week and they all told me that FDR’s New Deal was highly successful and brought us out of the Depression.

Now Obama comes along and says the New Deal wasn’t successful.

Am I missing something?


45 posted on 01/29/2009 7:24:43 AM PST by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jersey117
There is no way McCain can vote for this after basing his entire campaign on cutting spending. He’ll look like a total fool.

But he is a total fool.
46 posted on 01/29/2009 7:47:51 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority

We need a John Galt — desperately.


47 posted on 01/29/2009 7:48:21 AM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Give the money to the people. Bring jobs back to America. Anything else is just a popcorn fart.

You can't money from the people to give money to the people. That's just waste. Better to not take the money from them in the first place. If there were announced an 800 billion tax cut that was really a tax cut, not Obama's tax welfare, a tax cut that cut corporate income taxes by 75%, cut personal income taxes back to where they would have been had all of Reagan's tax cuts gone through, abolished the death tax, cut capital gains tax to about 5%, and lowered every other federal tax and "user fee" by 50%, there would be a bull market for the next 100 years (as there was in Great Britain after Smith trashed the punitive tax structure there) and investment would pour into the United States. But such a move would mean liberty for people to do with their money as they please and totalists like Obama don't believe people are smart enough or good enough or responsible enough to have control over their own lives.
48 posted on 01/29/2009 7:55:02 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The Republicans are historically correct, but that solution will not work in the current situation.

At the start of the Great Depression, the US was hit with severe deflation, accompanied by tremendous overproduction. “You could buy a pound of hamburger for a nickel, but nobody had any nickels.” The currency needed tremendous inflation along with a massive increase in the money supply. But, critically, this could be done because US debt levels were near zero.

Roosevelt’s plan was to reduce production, especially of agricultural products, then spend so much money that people would have money to spend. This would be done by creating debt.

This differs from today in many serious ways. To start with, we have a split economy. A “real” economy of goods and services, which has been in decline for many years, often through outsourcing. And a “fake”, or “leverage” economy, based solely on speculation, and speculation based on speculation.

So right now, it would be as if Roosevelt was trying to recuperate the ridiculously high margin stock market that existed before the crash. It not only can’t work, it shouldn’t work, because it was based solely on leverage, not reality. Houses that cost $100k to build cannot be sustained at sale prices of $750k. The market won’t tolerate it, for the best of all reasons: it makes no sense. It is demanding something for nothing.

To make matters much, much worse, not only are the leverage markets operating at debt levels a factor greater than the US ($150T compared to only $15T), the the credit and debt system is facing collapse. There is literally nobody left who has the money to pay for a US government spending spree. There is again literally, not enough money in the entire world to finance a return of the massive leverage markets.

“Leverage delenda est”. Leverage must be destroyed. It must, or else the real economy of goods and services cannot be rebuilt, ending the depression.

Imagine an insanely obese man. Hundreds of pounds of fat cover his muscles, bones, and internal organs. He is also running out of money to buy the 100 or so Big Macs he eats every day. His problem is not his lack of money, even though he has borrowed as much money as he can to keep gobbling down food.

He has to lose the vast amount of fat he has accumulated before he can even begin to restore his vitals. He has to stop spending what money he can borrow to sustain his obesity. By controlling his gluttony, with or without surgery to directly remove his pillows of lard, is the only way he can slim down enough to even stand up.

Finally, when all that blubber is gone, he can start exercising again, which will do wonders for restoring his health, as long as he does not start to overeat again.

From Obama’s point of view, the worst advice the Republicans can give, and what his own party is trying out, is to force feed even more Big Macs down the gullet, as fast as possible. Throw in doughnuts, cake, ice cream, pizza, and every other fatty food they can think of to keep his weight up at all costs. And to take loans out in his name for all of it.

It isn’t working. It won’t work. It can’t work. And it shouldn’t work.


49 posted on 01/29/2009 8:06:10 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
FDR is certainly the Left’s Hero Meme of the Day. This morning, on the 7 AM (EST) CBS radio news, the reporter stated that the stimulus bill just passed by the house includes funds to repair public schools “built by Roosevelt”.

Since the Left turns its back on sound principles, but want what it wants, it can only support its grabs for power and glory by pointing to the few times that its policies had even the appearance of success. Happily, even the MSM is now having to acknowledge that Roosevelt turned the post-19929 recession into a depression, that lasted many years longer than it should have. But since when have facts mattered to the Left?

50 posted on 01/29/2009 8:21:02 AM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hellbender
If the libs think war is a great economic stimulus, why did they oppose the Vietnam War and the war in Iraq? Why do they always try to slash defense spending?

Because a healthy, prosperous economy undermines their drive to gain absolute power by making all of us completely dependent on them.

51 posted on 01/29/2009 8:34:46 AM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

“He who controls the present, controls the past. He who controls the past, controls the future.” George Orwell


52 posted on 01/29/2009 8:37:51 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Hey, Obama! Where's my check?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hellbender
Those are mainly just the Peaceniks who happen to attach themselves to the Dim party. (People's Party, you know)

IMO. there is no 2 party system. Expect Obama to be more Hawkish than we thought.(see appointees)

53 posted on 01/29/2009 1:40:41 PM PST by wolfcreek (There is no 2 party system only arrogant Pols and their handlers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

FDR also formed the SEC to make sure *outsiders* didn’t get into the Wall Street/Fed Reserve party.


54 posted on 01/29/2009 1:46:57 PM PST by wolfcreek (There is no 2 party system only arrogant Pols and their handlers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson