Posted on 01/29/2009 4:45:41 AM PST by Kaslin
Compare also the recent information about Rahm Emmanuel’s daily phone calls to the press in which he pretty much directs how they will report the news.
This should be no surprise to anyone as the lame stream media was and is in the tank for the 0
I don’t care for Bill Kristol, but compared to Pinch Sulzberger he is a colossus.
LOL! Emmanuel doesn't have to 'direct' them - they do it willingly.
Love that Tyrell.
"As the Times' financial condition has grown fragile, the publisher of the Times, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr., has become apprehensive that Kristol's conservative views could endanger the health of some of the newspaper's neurotic liberal readers. "
Like Jimmy Carter maybe? He kept sending The Times xeroxed copies of Kristol's articles corrected and marked up in red ink with twenty pages of footnotes,of overly-detailed counter-proposals. In the end it was too much for the editorial staff and fact checkers running over to the library at Columbia to double-check in the National Geographics.
Either that or they just figured out what a "Straussian" is over at The Times. Threw them for a loop. When the white-bearded professor at Columbia finished explaining what that was they got coffee all over their notepads. Now they're busy brooding over the Cliffsnotes and Monarch Notes of Plato's Republic looking for the hidden clues, nervously reading back issues of The Weekly Standard.
I don’t see the big deal.
Because of guys like Kristol and David Brooks we ended up with McCain.
There were many reasons, but the elitists on the conservative side were part of the problem, and these guys are just that.
I’m glad he’s gone.
Frankly, I think hiring psuedo conservatives has been a plan on part of the NYT to do damage to the conservative movement.
Ditto, except that he’s still around spewing blue blood beltway republicanism.
I know he’s not a jeff Sessions clone, but Bill Krisol did support Palin did he not, very early? I thought I heard him say that he thoought she would be a good VP pick months before the pick was made? Others like Charles K did not offer much early support at all
Billy Kristol (McC campaign mastermind)
"Thank you very much. But I could not have done it without the help of all the
punkeos--David Frum,Michael Gerson, David Brooks, Richard Perle.......and my
Dearest Daddy."
"Sniffle---my Dearest Daddy (who was Giuliani's foreign policy advisor) said,
"The historical task and political purpose of neoconservatism would seem
to be.....to convert the Republican Party and American conservatism in general,
against their respective wills, into a new kind of conservative politics suitable
to governing a modern democracy."
"Sob."
"I especially want to thank punkneo Douglas Feith for faking documents on his
home computer so we punkneos could dupe the president."
"Without Doug we would not have been able to transfer trillions of US dollars
into the Mideast, into the pockets of war profiteers, which enabled Richard Perle
to startup an oil business in Iraq with his cut."
Kristol smirked: "Making Iraq safe for Perle's oil business with US tax dollars was truly a noble punkneo effort."
==============================================
COMMENTS The political entrail readings showed the crucial conservative base stayed home.........too bad the pukes "forget" to tell McC that would be one outcome of the punkneo-RINO bi-partisanship. Be aware that many senior neocons are rank opportunists who squatted in the Repub Party for their stealth purposes-----they are actually former Trotskyites that flew the coop when Stalin executed their hero.
AS FREEPER TADSLOS COGENTLY POSTED: "People forget that candy-ass Kristol, and his crony, metro-sexual Brooks are the original makeover artists for McCain post-2000. They are McC's original groomers and media switch operators. Kristol then urged McCain to fire his staff, to start all over at the 11th hour, as McC's numbers tanked. Shows how how ill conceived, advised, equipped and poorly managed McC's campaign was. But then, what else to expect from a Republican candidate made up of neopunks' Kristol and Brooks."
I agree. The networks like to have a token conservative (out of a panel of 3 or 4 libs), so they can claim they are not biased. However, they pick people like Kristol and Will, who are “nuanced” and wimpy, and will throw criticism of conservatives into their dialogue. You will never see anyone in the MSM who is uncompromising and aggressive, like Tyrell or Limbaugh.
Watching him nervously squirm in his FNC seat on election night as his "straight talk" weasel and bullshitter lost his bid for the presidency was a my consolation prize to this abortion of an election cycle.
The NYTimes purifying its ranks. It’s what a cult does before it goes belly up.
Too many TV show seats allocated grudgingly by the mediawhores to conservatives are filled with the likes of inside-the-beltway, linguini-spined RINOS posing as conservatives.
I don't even know if they're still on, but George Will and the other bow-tied younger noodle fit my above assessment.
Leni
Leni
Bingo!!!
Oui.
What used to be the "libarally biased media" are now the "Government-Controlled Media."
Big difference and vewwy skewwy.
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.