Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's New 'Fairness Doctrine'
Human Events ^ | 11/20/2008 | Jack Thompson

Posted on 01/28/2009 5:39:08 PM PST by Delacon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
The “Fairness Doctrine” is The Censorship Doctrine

Media Research Center's Free Speech Alliance is a fast-growing coalition of organizations and individuals, who, like you, cherish free speech and who have proactively joined to ensure the misnamed “Fairness Doctrine” never returns to silence the conservative voice in America.

First enacted by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) in 1949, the Fairness Doctrine required radio stations give equal time to all sides on political issues. However, the result wasn’t equal time, it was zero time – as stations simply avoided topics that would fall under FCC equal time rules.

In 1987, President Ronald Reagan rescinded the Fairness Doctrine and since then, talk radio has flourished. Conservatives dominate it, and liberals can’t stand it. By re-instating the Fairness Doctrine, liberals would effectively silence the conservative leaders of the day including Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Laura Ingraham and others, and would essentially take control of all forms of media.

In recent months, the groundswell for reinstatement is intensifying. In fact, a growing number of liberal leaders in Washington, including Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, have openly stated their intent to do so.

As Americans, we cannot sit idly by while this gag order on conservative speech is resuscitated. The time to act is now—so when the time comes, we are mobilized and prepared to defend our Free Speech Rights.



Join the hundreds of thousands of citizens taking action now through MRC’s Free Speech Alliance, and our national petition opposing the re-instatement of the Fairness Doctrine. Media Research Center’s Free Speech Alliance goal is to mobilize 500,000 citizens to forever end the threat of the Fairness Doctrine and other attacks on Free Speech. Click on this link.
http://www.mrcaction.org/517/petition.asp?PID=18645182
 
Freepmail me if you want to join my fairness doctrine ping list.

1 posted on 01/28/2009 5:39:08 PM PST by Delacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Delacon
Photobucket
2 posted on 01/28/2009 5:41:17 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (I wish it was 20 January 2013. I've had enough of this crap already.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

It will backfire on Obama if he does this


3 posted on 01/28/2009 5:42:56 PM PST by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel; steelyourfaith; neverdem; free_life; LibertyRocks; MNReaganite; ...

Nah, them libs can’t be crazy enough to try a push for that fairness doctrine considering how obviously unpopular it is. Mandating opposing political povs is just not doable right? Well what if you try something different that achieves the same ends. THATS WHAT LIBS DO. Localism is the new fairness doctrine.


4 posted on 01/28/2009 5:44:31 PM PST by Delacon ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: valkyry1

“It will backfire on Obama if he does this”

Playing the devil’s(liberl’s)advocate: What? Are you opposed to a diversity of opinions? Don’t you think local opinions are important? Shouldn’t everyone have a right to speak out?


5 posted on 01/28/2009 5:49:25 PM PST by Delacon ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

Call it what it really is:

The Fairness Gag.

or

The Fairness Muzzle.


6 posted on 01/28/2009 5:51:16 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
I'm pretty local. I want to speak out. Most of all I want to FORCE Nancy Pelosi to listen to me first ~ is Obama gonna' give me that?

Not likely.

7 posted on 01/28/2009 5:57:31 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
They will kill talk radio to save the planet. Just think of all the electricity that won't be consumed by the radio transmitters and receivers that will be in the OFF position. I don't expect my HD radio to ever have any over the air traffic. It was a $40 bargain at Circuit City as the $200 Sony HD radios just collected dust. Absent any HD stations, they are just mediocre AM/FM radios. My "bargain" is sitting in the basement where I work during the summer to avoid the heat in the upstairs office.

The Sirius/XM merger deal came with strings attached. They had to allocate of bunch of channels for liberal trash that nobody really wants. Sirius/XM lost $1 billion last quarter. I'm afraid it is destined to be dead electronics in my Mercury Mariner. If they die, that will be one less expense.

What's left is live streaming or podcasts. We'll have to see what Obambi tries to destroy that medium. You can bet his internet hoard will be employed to damage that remaining resource.

8 posted on 01/28/2009 6:15:41 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

I can guarantee that Obama will push for a combination of localism and the old Fairness Doctrine as it was, so that he can put liberal talk radio out of business. He will also require the fairness doctrine for tv broadcasters, cable and satellite radio/tv operations.


9 posted on 01/28/2009 6:20:47 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

The “Hush Rush” Legislation.


10 posted on 01/28/2009 6:24:30 PM PST by getarope (I will give Obama as much respect as the MSM gave W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

Actually, its quite good that Obama is attacking Rush personally and directly. These attacks will make it that much harder to win a Supreme Court case which takes Rush off the air.


11 posted on 01/28/2009 6:26:33 PM PST by norwaypinesavage (Global Warming Theory is extremely robust with respect to data. All observations confirm it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage

Until he appoints one to two judges...


12 posted on 01/28/2009 6:31:31 PM PST by Delacon ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

“I’m pretty local. I want to speak out. Most of all I want to FORCE Nancy Pelosi to listen to me first ~ is Obama gonna’ give me that?
Not likely.”

For one, most radio IS local. Most radio is NOT national. When I turn on my radio, AM or FM I mostly get Philly market local and two stations 1150 and 1450 here in Delaware. One runs Glen Beck, Rush, and Hannity and local broadcasting, the other is devoted to LOCAL liberal pundits and other local broadcasting because I live in a purple state. Liberal talking heads already thrive in liberal markets. They only fail when they try to go national like with Air America because lefty mush only sells in the cities and isolated liberal enclaves. But don’t miss the point which is that Obama would be happy to push more localism in broadcasting not because there isnt enough of it but because more of it will kill off Rush, Hannity, Ingraham, Bennett, Beck etc.


13 posted on 01/28/2009 6:49:42 PM PST by Delacon ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

>> Until he appoints one to two judges...

The only judges about to answer to the Grim Reaper are libs anyway. He can maintain the status quo, but to pack the bench with libs would be tough, unless he has in mind offing a couple conservatives.

Of course, life is uncertain, and we never know exactly when the Lord will say, “time’s up” to, say, John Roberts.

On the other hand, we don’t know when the Lord will say, “time’s up” to Barack Hussein Obama. Or Nancy Pelosi. Or Barney Frank. Or ...


14 posted on 01/28/2009 6:51:52 PM PST by Nervous Tick (Party? I don't have one anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

“The only judges about to answer to the Grim Reaper are libs anyway. He can maintain the status quo, but to pack the bench with libs would be tough, unless he has in mind offing a couple conservatives.”

Bush got two FINE conservatives judges appointed in Roberts and Alito with less of a control of congress than Obama now has. And considering the patty cake that is going on in congress over Obama’s other appointments, two ultra liberal supremes don’t seem at all unlikely.


15 posted on 01/28/2009 6:57:09 PM PST by Delacon ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

bump


16 posted on 01/28/2009 7:01:48 PM PST by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage
These attacks will make it that much harder to win a Supreme Court case which takes Rush off the air.

Would that be the same Supreme Court that keeps avoiding the question of Comrade Oboingo's birth certificate?

17 posted on 01/28/2009 7:08:28 PM PST by Iron Munro (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Though Ginsberg and Stevens are most likely to be on their ahem way out, since they are already liberal, their replacements would be a wash for conservatives. But next on deck is Kennedy and Scalia. Kennedy not so much but Scalia being replaced by an Obama appointee would be catastropic.


18 posted on 01/28/2009 7:08:41 PM PST by Delacon ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

>> But next on deck is Kennedy and Scalia.

Hey, chin up, FRiend!

I’m not counting on Obama to hang around that long.


19 posted on 01/28/2009 7:10:25 PM PST by Nervous Tick (Party? I don't have one anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
Before Limbaugh, AM radio was slowly passing away by sheer irrelevance. Many of the younger generation had never listened to an AM station. AM’s demographics went from bad to worse.

If Limbaugh “saved” AM radio by helping many of those stations to switch to a popular all-talk format while music moved towards FM stations, then owners of AM stations should be having visions of a death again.

The Left, who loves to complain about consolidation in station ownership will force even more loss of jobs and consolidation should they succeed in shutting down conservative talk radio.

And to those who think that liberals may get licenses that conservative owners lose? Not so fast! There is no market for liberal Babel. Who wants to listen to Air America wannabes when driving across the fruited plain? People like Limbaugh will go where they can retain the most audience, where the Left has not yet tried to reach. This will be satellite radio, or maybe even internet radio.

With 3G and 4G cell phone service having wider coverage, this will be possible even for autos. Ford, in conjunction with Telcordia, has announced internet connectivity for one of its models:

Telcordia Turns Ford Car into Wireless Communication Center; Ground-Breaking Technology Creates...
Publication: Business Wire
Date: Wednesday, May 3 2006

PISCATAWAY, N.J. — In collaboration with Ford Motor Company, Telcordia (www.telcordia.com) today revealed a completely wireless-enabled Ford Five Hundred sedan. ...

from:
http://www.allbusiness.com/electronics/computer-electronics-manufacturing/5473176-1.html

Chrysler has made a similar announcement:

http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/daily-news/080626-Chrysler-to-Debut-In-Car-Wireless-Internet-Today/

20 posted on 01/28/2009 7:17:15 PM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson