Posted on 01/28/2009 9:44:27 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
One week ago....ONE WEEK...he stated under oath that he would "preserve, protect and defend The Constitution."
How does he reconcile that with his latest statement regarding The Constitution?
Grounds for impeachment. I'm sure our MSM media will demand he retract the statement.
Keep sending cases up to SCOTUS over the BC & usurper with military plaintiffs - active, reserve and retired. Let SCOTUS tell the military personnel they have no standing or are denied.
Next, let the entire military know that they have no rights and are serfs. They are risking their life to defend the Constitution that SCOTUS will not uphold. It is not over yet but SCOTUS needs to act on one of the next 5 cases there.
Conservative talk show host should have been kicking in money for helping attorneys like Orly, Pidgeon, Berg, Kreep and others. I guess spending av gas for the jet to go see the Steelers was a higher priority.
Posted here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2166819/posts?page=33#33
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2166819/posts?page=34#34
Another item of interest:
Obama once backed full gay marriage [in 1996]
Windy City Times ^ | 2009-01-13 | Windy City Times
Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:25:12 AM by Matchett-PI
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2165041/posts
“One week ago....ONE WEEK...he stated under oath that he would “preserve, protect and defend The Constitution.”
How does he reconcile that with his latest statement regarding The Constitution?”
He had a do-over in the Oval Office. The second time around he didn’t swear to preserve, protect and defend the Consititution. He swore to kill babies and free terrorists and turn the United States of America into a third world nation.
“One week ago....ONE WEEK...he stated under oath that he would “preserve, protect and defend The Constitution.”
How does he reconcile that with his latest statement regarding The Constitution? “
He is a DemocRAT, that’s how.
Same thing with Hollywood actors/actresses. I'm surprised at how tiny some of those people are.
I call the Communityorganizer-in-Chief a deeply flawed individual...
“...generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states can’t do to you, it says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf. And that hasn’t shifted.”
none of this is new (it has been discussed numerous times) but people need to know what an unAmerican president they have elected (one who will most certainly violate his oath to UPHOLD the Constitution). He sees it as an obstacle to his agenda.
"It says what the states can’t do to you, it says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf."
He's also a moron with no clue as to the nature of the document.
And you know that he (or they) do not send money to this and other conservative causes how? Real conservatives do not make a point of announcing their donations but do it for the proper reasons.
“Same thing with Hollywood actors/actresses. I’m surprised at how tiny some of those people are. “
Reptilians masquerading as humans.
But, but, but, isn’t THE ONE a CONSTITUTIONAL lawyer and knows the document inside and out?
The biggest flaw is that it doesn't place term limits on legislators.
If that's the case, he's worse than a moron...he's a liar.
Personally, I suspect both.
To be fair to Obama this is a sickness that many politicians at all levels, and in both parties, have. Whatever it is they want to accomplish, they see the Constitution as only a hindrance to get around, not as something that defines the hard limits of their power.
Sedition.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.