So, in your view, the ex parte applies even absent a single shred of evidence that the court case was discussed?
Again, I’m not a lawyer, just a regular guy, but doesn’t the case need to come up for the ex parte to apply?
give it up, already.
you are wrong.
they only met on the implicit presumption that
the case against the defendant (obama) would be thrown.
they laughed joked. probably raises were promised
indirectly. then the defendant won.
Ex parte contact occurs when an attorney communicates with another party outside the presence of that party's attorney. Ex parte contact also describes a judge who communicates with one party to a lawsuit to the exclusion of the other party or parties, or a judge who initiates discussions about a case with disinterested third parties. Canon 3(A)(4) of the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Code of Judicial Conduct discourages judges from such ex parte communications. Under rule 4.2 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Responsibility, a lawyer should refrain from contacting a party who the lawyer knows is represented by another attorney, unless the lawyer has the consent of the other attorney or is authorized by law to do so.