Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Message to all our men and women in uniform: When encountering TERRORISTS using deadly force anywhere Shoot to Kill. STOP TAKING PRISONERS! Thank You!
1 posted on 01/27/2009 11:31:47 AM PST by ezfindit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ezfindit

If they do that, they’re going to get put on trial by our own chain of command, which has already happened several times in the Bush administration.


2 posted on 01/27/2009 11:34:31 AM PST by jpl (Help us Obambi Wan Kenobi, you're our only dope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ezfindit
Take No Prisoners from this point forward.

Commanding Officer.................

4 posted on 01/27/2009 11:36:00 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ezfindit

Works for me. These people wish for nothing more than to die for the cause of jihad, so our soldiers should do everything they can to help them achieve this goal.


7 posted on 01/27/2009 11:38:24 AM PST by ZirconEncrustedTweezers (Dan Gurney for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ezfindit

This is something I have been saying from the beginning.


9 posted on 01/27/2009 11:39:40 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ezfindit

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97hyDRjdXCE

Shoot to Kill. STOP TAKING PRISONERS!

I agree 100%


12 posted on 01/27/2009 11:41:44 AM PST by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ezfindit

> Message to all our men and women in uniform: When encountering TERRORISTS using deadly force anywhere Shoot to Kill. STOP TAKING PRISONERS! Thank You!

For better or for worse, your message to the Allied Forces will be ignored because militaries worldwide only take orders from their superior officers.

In the case of the US Military, that would ultimately be your new Commander-in-Chief Barack Hussein Obama Dada thru General Petraeus.

If he wanted to issue a “No Prisoners” order he probably would. My guess is that he won’t, for any number of reasons.


13 posted on 01/27/2009 11:42:09 AM PST by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ezfindit

My sentiments exactly - no more debate, no more wasted tax $$


14 posted on 01/27/2009 11:42:32 AM PST by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ezfindit
Two ex-Guantanamo inmates appear in Al-Qaeda video
15 posted on 01/27/2009 11:42:53 AM PST by smokingfrog (T.A.R.P. = Viagra for politicians and you get screwed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ezfindit

Better yet, take as many prisoners as possible, then tell them all that the person who gives the most valuable intelligence will be allowed to live while all the others die. Then you will see who wants to die for Allah and who doesn’t buy the 72 virgins crap.


19 posted on 01/27/2009 12:04:51 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money. Margret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ezfindit
The logical conclusion, and it's not too far away, is that these scum will be tried in courts of law. Thus our troops will have to retrieve evidence from the battlefield, give depositions, set up a 12,000-mile long evidence chain of custody and fly halfway around the world to trials so the defendant can face his accuser.

That means taking a prisoner will result members pulled off the line to give depositions and attend trials. It also means troops will have to risk their lives to gather "evidence" beyond what's needed militarily. Any commander worth his salt will determine that the added risks and serious depletion of a unit's firepower makes taking prisoners untenable. We will lose valuable intel that captives can provide as they will now be killed instead.

The President and all his lawyer friends can gloat about how we've "rejoined the world" while the people whose rights they're championing are being killed instead of imprisoned. American soldiers will also die from the reduced intel flow. Nice job - dickheads.

Does anyone else see a contradiction in how this Administration is fine with killing a suspected terrorist from a drone but refuses to interrogate prisoners? It's OK to turn them into grease spots, just don't make them uncomfortable. Guess we shouldn't point that out or the Zero will cancel the Predator strikes too.

20 posted on 01/27/2009 12:06:31 PM PST by Dilbert56 (Harry Reid, D-Nev.: "We're going to pick up Senate seats as a result of this war.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ezfindit

bookmark


21 posted on 01/27/2009 12:50:24 PM PST by manic4organic (We Are S0 Screwed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ezfindit
an 11% recidivism rate is outstanding, i think our prisons are in the 80-90% range.

my question is, why are these...people...released back into the wild without being radio-tagged and monitored?
22 posted on 01/27/2009 2:05:51 PM PST by CzarChasm (My opinion. No charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson