Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

Lincoln’s position on slavery was secondary to preserving the Union. He was not interested in ending slavery when the shots rang out at Ft Sumter. It was much later when Lincoln faced defeat, depleted supplies, chellenges recruiting soldiers, that he finally capitulated to the Abolitionists and Radical Republicans. He raised large amounts of Bostonian money and recruited 300,000 freed men after the Emancipation Proclamation. The Civil War was NOT about freeing the slaves. It was about Federal control over States Rights, taxing the exports of cotton, and keeping the South a merchantilized colony of the Northern textile industry. It was in the “public’s interest” to control cotton exports from going to higher paying Eurpoean markets.


8 posted on 01/27/2009 10:45:33 AM PST by DBCJR (What would you expect?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DBCJR

Well said.

Lincoln was about the Union: if preserving the Union meant defeating Slavery, he was for defeating slavery.

And if preserving the Union meant increasing Slavery, he would have been for that too.


11 posted on 01/27/2009 10:50:47 AM PST by agere_contra (So ... where's the birth certificate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson