Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was There Ever a Default on U.S. Treasury Debt?
American Spectator ^ | Jan 23,2009 | Alex J. Pollock

Posted on 01/26/2009 6:11:35 PM PST by SeekAndFind

As the bailouts in the current bust inexorably mount, financed in rapidly increasing U.S. government debt, one might wonder whether a default on Treasury debt is imaginable. In the course of history, did the U.S. ever default on its debt?

Well, yes: The United States quite clearly and overtly defaulted on its debt as an expediency in 1933, the first year of Franklin Roosevelt's presidency. This was an intentional repudiation of its obligations, supported by a resolution of Congress and later upheld by the Supreme Court.

Granted, the circumstances were somewhat different in those days, since government finance still had a real tie to gold. In particular, U.S. bonds, including those issued to finance the American participation in the First World War, provided the holders of the bonds with an unambiguous promise that the U.S. government would give them the option to be repaid in gold coin.

Nobody doubted the clarity of this "gold clause" provision or the intent of both the debtor, the U.S. Treasury, and the creditors, the bond buyers, that the bondholders be protected against the depreciation of paper currency by the government.

Unfortunately for the bondholders, when President Roosevelt and the Congress decided that it was a good idea to depreciate the currency in the economic crisis of the time, they also decided not to honor their unambiguous obligation to pay in gold. On June 5, 1933, Congress passed a "Joint Resolution to Assure Uniform Value to the Coins and Currencies of the United States," of which two key points were as follows:

* "Provisions of obligations which purport to give the obligee a right to require payment in gold obstruct the power of the Congress."

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: default; treasury; treasurydebt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

1 posted on 01/26/2009 6:11:36 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Economagic.com reports that the CPI in June of 1933 was 12.70 and in December 2008 was 211.49. With deliberate inflation, change by a factor of 1652% (!), this is nothing less than deliberate default in slow motion.
2 posted on 01/26/2009 6:17:53 PM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Interesting article.

Since the US defaulted on its debt, and it was thus put into receivership, who ended up the owners of the country?


3 posted on 01/26/2009 6:19:37 PM PST by oblomov (Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods. - Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

depreciate is not the same as default. Thats like saying someone died when they’re dying


4 posted on 01/26/2009 6:26:48 PM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane
depreciate is not the same as default. Thats like saying someone died when they’re dying

No it isn't. It's like saying I owe a hundred but I'm only going to pay ten. That is a default.

5 posted on 01/26/2009 6:36:49 PM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: theBuckwheat

You are correct. There is a default every time the printing presses are turned on.


6 posted on 01/26/2009 6:40:06 PM PST by elkfersupper (Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Was There Ever a Default on U.S. Treasury Debt?

Don't worry, we won't default. We'll just print more money to cover it.
7 posted on 01/26/2009 6:41:56 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

bfl


8 posted on 01/26/2009 6:43:01 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theBuckwheat
Which is 3.8% per year. Loans pay interest. Duh.
9 posted on 01/26/2009 6:52:11 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp
Hardly, since in 1933 a single dollar bought 140% as much as it bought in 1929.
10 posted on 01/26/2009 6:52:59 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

Great quote

About 250 years ago, in a celebrated essay, “Of Public Credit,” David Hume wrote:

“Contracting debt will almost infallibly be abused in every government. It would scarcely be more imprudent to give a prodigal son a credit in every banker’s shop in London, than to empower a statesman to draw bills upon posterity.”


11 posted on 01/26/2009 6:54:26 PM PST by milwguy (........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
Nonsense. If the money supply were constant, it would mean a real wealth transfer to the holders of dollar debts of 3-4% per year in real terms. All wealth is increasing all the time. There is no reason for money to be any different.
12 posted on 01/26/2009 6:54:31 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

Okay. Then there is the scenario that the U.S. never actually repays its debt, it simply issues more debt instruments.


13 posted on 01/26/2009 6:59:12 PM PST by elkfersupper (Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: milwguy
Power is infallible abused. Doesn't matter if that power is in the hands of government or private hands, whether it is financial or economic or military or political. Men are not angels. This is not a reason to abolish all power, nor to abolish mankind.

Burke had it right and all the ideologues since have had and still have it wrong. Power must always exist in any community, whatever you call it. You cannot remove vices from mankind by abolishing the names it took or the particular men or institutions it operated within, last year or last generation or last century.

You cannot remove vices from mankind, full stop. You can moderate them and further better conduct, that is all. Whether men are governed well is up to them, they are free, no ideology or law or other constraint can possible decide that for them.

The Romans had hyperinflation with a metallic currency.

The Kuwaitis had a stock market bubble financed entirely by post-dated checks.

Outlawing folly is Canute ordering the sea not to come in.

14 posted on 01/26/2009 7:00:47 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
All debts outstanding in the US have grown continually at a 7.5% annual compound rate since the end of WW II.

So has the value of all US assets.

Nothing unsustainable about a particle of it. The nominal economy has grown 7% per year compounded. Corporate profits, 7% per year compounding. It is normal. It isn't a problem.

15 posted on 01/26/2009 7:02:35 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

> Since the US defaulted on its debt, and it was thus put into receivership, who ended up the owners of the country?
Communists.


16 posted on 01/26/2009 7:08:08 PM PST by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

There’s a line in Dickens - could be the Christmas Carol - where he uses “US Security” as a pejorative, as in ‘as solid as a US Security’


17 posted on 01/26/2009 7:08:51 PM PST by sobieski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JasonC
"Hardly, since in 1933 a single dollar bought 140% as much as it bought in 1929."

And a bond sold with the promise of repayment in the amount of 1 ounce of gold bought how much gold?

18 posted on 01/26/2009 7:11:44 PM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JasonC
It is normal. It isn't a problem.

What was growth of the national economy and corporate profits in the last 3 quarters of 2008 and year-to-date?

19 posted on 01/26/2009 7:12:04 PM PST by elkfersupper (Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sobieski
That was referring to the railroad and canal manias of the 1840s. Many British investors speculated on them, and in the various crashes, plenty lost bundles. Of course, those who listened to Dickens and never touched a US investment again, promptly missed out on the greatest boom in the history of the world.
20 posted on 01/26/2009 7:12:24 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson