Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Calpernia

THey already have one case that list the SoS as having the burden, Cort’s. The opinion given on it will take care of the other 49 states. (In our opinion they will be found not to have the responsibility to vet in the past (not guilty) but may be given that task in the future, or maybe not)

Orley needs to place the burden where it belongs on bo and the DNC.


128 posted on 01/27/2009 7:25:23 AM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: hoosiermama

>>>Orley needs to place the burden where it belongs on bo and the DNC.

She has a Keyes v. Obama. It was part of the Supplemental Filing that was dismissed Monday also.


130 posted on 01/27/2009 7:29:34 AM PST by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

To: hoosiermama

“Orley needs to place the burden where it belongs on bo and the DNC.”

If there has been fraud, I believe they are in on it. But it makes me nervous for the future, to have the DNC and RNC be responsible for vetting their own candidates. I hope in the future it is a more bipartisan or neutral agency which would be responsible for vetting. Preferrably before the candidate is even allowed on the ballot. The general election is too late, IMO.


288 posted on 01/31/2009 2:48:06 PM PST by canaan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson