To: DieHard the Hunter
Its only called war if a number of very narrow circumstances have been met. And they are only permitted to participate in war under a similar very narrow set of defined circumstances. That's an excellent point. I'd add, however, that the U.S. military campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan probably don't even constitute "warfare" under the legal standards of the United States.
55 posted on
01/25/2009 6:37:50 AM PST by
Alberta's Child
(I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
To: Alberta's Child
> That’s an excellent point. I’d add, however, that the U.S. military campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan probably don’t even constitute “warfare” under the legal standards of the United States.
Interesting... what would they be? “Policing actions”, perhaps? That would be my first guess.
56 posted on
01/25/2009 6:53:04 AM PST by
DieHard the Hunter
(Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fà g am bealach.)
To: Alberta's Child
Congress granted the president (Bush W) the power to do what it takes but they did not sign a deceleration of War so I believe technically it is just a police action on paper. Not a lawyer so there may be another term for it.
65 posted on
01/25/2009 7:23:16 AM PST by
jafojeffsurf
(A terrorist is an anaminal and should be treated so)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson