Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DieHard the Hunter
It’s only called war if a number of very narrow circumstances have been met. And they are only permitted to participate in war under a similar very narrow set of defined circumstances.

That's an excellent point. I'd add, however, that the U.S. military campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan probably don't even constitute "warfare" under the legal standards of the United States.

55 posted on 01/25/2009 6:37:50 AM PST by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

> That’s an excellent point. I’d add, however, that the U.S. military campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan probably don’t even constitute “warfare” under the legal standards of the United States.

Interesting... what would they be? “Policing actions”, perhaps? That would be my first guess.


56 posted on 01/25/2009 6:53:04 AM PST by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

Congress granted the president (Bush W) the power to do what it takes but they did not sign a deceleration of War so I believe technically it is just a police action on paper. Not a lawyer so there may be another term for it.


65 posted on 01/25/2009 7:23:16 AM PST by jafojeffsurf (A terrorist is an anaminal and should be treated so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson