Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If there is a Supreme Court appointment this summer….
SCOTUS Blog ^ | Saturday, January 24th, 2009 2:39 pm | Tom Goldstein

Posted on 01/24/2009 1:15:39 PM PST by thecodont

Before the election, I wrote two posts (here and here) on likely Democratic nominees to the Supreme Court. It seems an appropriate time for an update. For example, despite my earlier predictions, Elliot Spitzer’s odds now seem lower, and President Obama is unlikely to appoint himself.

Equally important, we can learn something from the President’s initial appointments to other jobs in the government. In my opinion, they seem pragmatic and focused on objective qualifications (including academic appointments) and tend less than did those of Clinton and Bush 43 towards friends of the President. The appointments to date have also involved few totally out of the box and unexpected choices. The appointments have been diverse, but the choices don’t seem race and gender driven.

We also have the benefit of the President’s specific appointment of Elena Kagan to be SG, which elevates her prospects considerably.

In my opinion, if there is an appointment this summer — which principally means that some otherwise serious candidates will not yet have had the time to be appointed to a court of appeals and develop experience there — there are three reasonably clear front runners, and one dark horse candidate. All are women, for the simple reason that there is only one woman on the Court now and I cannot imagine that the President will conclude that he cannot find a highly qualified female nominee.

The three obvious candidates are Elena Kagan (SG), Sonia Sotomajor (CA2), and Diane Wood (CA7). The sleeper candidate is Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm.

(Excerpt) Read more at scotusblog.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: appointments; bho44; bhoscotus; dianewood; granholm; kagan; obama; sotomajor; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 01/24/2009 1:15:42 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thecodont
the President’s initial appointments to other jobs in the government. In my opinion, they seem pragmatic and focused on objective qualifications (including academic appointments) and tend less than did those of Clinton and Bush 43 towards friends of the President

Stupid stupid stupid. The official offices are filled with wax dummies who could be confirmed quickly and look re-assuring to the masses. They mostly won't be heard from again.

The real government will be by a host of vaguely defined "advisors" and "czars" who will not have to go through public confirmation hearings and can hide out in the White House beyond public scrutiny and beyond accountability. So much for "transparency" and "accountability," the sucker bait for the unwary.

2 posted on 01/24/2009 1:26:35 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thecodont
It is a shame that much of the trajectory of our republic is dictated by nine unelected blackrobes in the despotic branch.

This branch found Social Security, Progressive Income Taxes, Medicare, Medicaid, and other transfer payments to be constitutional.

There is no doubt they will find Obamacare to be Constitutional. That will be the tipping point. It will be over for our republic.

3 posted on 01/24/2009 1:28:59 PM PST by Jacquerie (More central planning is not the solution to the failure of central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

My guess is that Stevens will retire this summer and Obama will need to fill a quota cell, most likely a Hispanic with his first SC nomination.

His second appointment will be a woman for the Ginsberg seat.

A third appointment would be an African American for the Souter seat.

And if he gets a fourth pick he will have to go with the ultimate affirmative action pick, a white male.


4 posted on 01/24/2009 1:29:22 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thecodont
Excuse my ignorance here, but are SC nominees always judges? I ask this because I have felt (and feared) that Zero has something large in mind for Lawrence Lessig at some point.

Maybe just some sort of Cyber Czar appointment or something, but these two seem pretty tight.

Lessig used to be a decent egg - clerking under Scalia, but academia has ruined him to the point where I consider him a danger.

5 posted on 01/24/2009 1:29:30 PM PST by FlJoePa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

It’ll go to Billy boy


6 posted on 01/24/2009 1:32:46 PM PST by Gone_Postal ("Men who say it cannot be done, should not interupt those doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gone_Postal
It’ll go to Billy boy

Wasn't he disbarred from the Arkansas Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court? If so, how could he be seated as an Associate Justice at SCOTUS?

7 posted on 01/24/2009 1:37:30 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FlJoePa
Excuse my ignorance here, but are SC nominees always judges?

Usually, but not always. In fact, a person does not even have to hold a JD to sit on the High Court.

8 posted on 01/24/2009 1:41:40 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thecodont
not sure about Supreme Courts I just thought it was from the state of Arkansas

But what would that matter anyhow...it's the age of Obama, and whom ever he wants he gets...damn the constitution

9 posted on 01/24/2009 1:44:00 PM PST by Gone_Postal ("Men who say it cannot be done, should not interupt those doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

Clinton will not be appointed to the SCOTUS due to his age. Obama’s appointments to the SCOTUS will consist of people in their 30’s and 40’s.


10 posted on 01/24/2009 1:44:17 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

A law license in not needed to be a Justice on the SCOTUS.


11 posted on 01/24/2009 1:45:53 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thecodont
Wasn't he disbarred from the Arkansas Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court? If so, how could he be seated as an Associate Justice at SCOTUS?

NO QUESTIONS, PEASANT! President Clinton is a God among men, a Democrat. They don't have to answer to commoners like you. Democrats OWN the Constitution. We members of the proletariat are to remain in awe of their mastery of that document, and accept every word they utter about it in amazed worship. Remember that.

12 posted on 01/24/2009 2:22:21 PM PST by Hardastarboard (The Fairness Doctrine isn't about "Fairness" - it's about Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thecodont
The sleeper candidate is Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm.

She's a sleeper all right. She's been asleep and a complete disaster for Michigan as governor. Supreme Court Justice, my A$$.

13 posted on 01/24/2009 2:26:09 PM PST by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

Obama will be looking for a female Hispanic who is a Muslim.


14 posted on 01/24/2009 2:26:18 PM PST by Fresh Wind (Hey, Obama! Where's my check?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

Here is a scary guess Laurence Tribe. A teacher of Obama’s at Harvard.


15 posted on 01/24/2009 3:40:16 PM PST by scottteng (IMPEACH OBAMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

And lesbian.


16 posted on 01/24/2009 3:46:00 PM PST by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: thecodont
President Obama is unlikely to appoint himself.

Not necessarily. How about this scenario:

Palin/Jindal win by a landslide in 2012, including massive loss of Democratic seats in the Senate.

There happens to be a vacancy on the Court.

Obama resigns, Biden succeeds him and nominates Obama to the Court.

The lame-duck Senate approves the nomination.

Obama has a life postition.

17 posted on 01/24/2009 3:52:50 PM PST by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thecodont
Wasn't he disbarred from the Arkansas Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court? If so, how could he be seated as an Associate Justice at SCOTUS? His Arkansas law license was suspended for five years which ended in 2006. Don't know if he re-applied. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1544869/posts
18 posted on 01/24/2009 4:12:50 PM PST by DeepThought42 (No mercy, no quarter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
Interesting lame-duck scenario.

Palin/Jindal win by a landslide in 2012, including massive loss of Democratic seats in the Senate.

Bobby Jindal has as of late shown no interest at all in running for President in 2012. I personally believe that he thinks his status as a natural-born citizen is in question (since his parents did not become U.S. citizens before he was born here in Louisiana). If there is any question at all about his natural-born status (approaching it from whatever quadrant; McCain's status was in another quadrant), I do not believe he will run. I believe Bobby Jindal is an honorable man.

Palin, natural-born U.S. citizen of U.S citizen parents, will choose a running mate whose natural-born status is also unquestionable.

19 posted on 01/24/2009 4:18:21 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: thecodont
If anyone thinks the commie rats will endanger the keystone of their power, the choke hold they have on the SCOTUS, by appoint ting pragmatic qualified candidates, they are out of their minds.

Does P.BO have some kind of mesmerizing rays that are emitted from his eyes so he can make people do anything he wants?

Also, thanks to McCain and the gang of 14 all of GWBs appellate judges never got a vote and liberal socialist commie judges will now fill those posts. And I bet McCain will vote with the DIMS.

On a lighter note, I can't wait for the pubbies to filibuster one of P. BOs’s judges. The Dims will change the rules and roll them in a matter of hours. I expect to see many shocked faces.

20 posted on 01/24/2009 4:33:35 PM PST by Nuc1 (NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson